My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-09-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2018
>
04-09-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 11:20:08 AM
Creation date
5/24/2019 11:09:11 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
226
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
L' :.18 00001 <br />3.11 1.18 <br />i_'age 5 o 5 <br />Practical Difficulties Analysis <br />The planning commission should discuss whether the minimal encroachments are appropriate, <br />given the location of the existing structure, and the neighboring properties distance from the lake. <br />Engineer Comments <br />1. The applicant should be required to have a service connection that is separate from the <br />neighbor to the south. <br />2. The applicant should consider granting easement to the neighbor to the south as that <br />properties sanitary service seems to encroach. <br />3. The drainage on the north east portion of the lot appears to flow to a drainage structure <br />on the lot to the north. An agreement should be worked out with the owner to address <br />future access and maintenance. <br />Public Comments <br />Both neighbors have submitted the acknowledgement forms Exhibit E. One has submitted <br />written comment for the Planning Commission to review, Exhibit F. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Will these variances effect the neighboring vacant lot? <br />2. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br />property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br />3. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character of the neighborhood? <br />4. Does the Commission find standards for granting the average lakeshore setback <br />variance are met? <br />5. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Planning Staff Recommendation <br />The Planning Commission should discuss the requested variances and if the commission finds <br />reasonable findings then they should consider recommending approval. <br />If the Planning Commission proceeds with a recommendation to approve. The approval should <br />follow the engineer's recommendation to require the applicant to connect their own sewer <br />service for the property separate from the neighbors. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A. <br />Application <br />Exhibit B. <br />Practical Difficulties Documentation Form <br />Exhibit C. <br />Existing & Proposed Survey and Elevations <br />Exhibit D. <br />Project Narrative <br />Exhibit E. <br />Property Owners Acknowledgement Form <br />Exhibit F. <br />Comments from the Public <br />Exhibit G. <br />Property Owners List and Map <br />Exhibit H. <br />Photos <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.