Laserfiche WebLink
L' '18 00001 <br />3.11 1.18 <br />age3o 5 <br />without variances if specific standards are met; such as: <br />1. All setback requirements can be met. <br />2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can <br />be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and <br />3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage <br />restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed <br />25 percent of the entire lot area. <br />4. All other zoning district standards can be met. <br />The applicants' need for setback and hardcover variances results in the property's inability to <br />conform to #1 and #3 above. Therefore, lot area and width variances are also required in order <br />to redevelop the property. <br />Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) <br />In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and <br />anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect <br />on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider <br />recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances <br />where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique <br />to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is <br />demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning <br />Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties <br />also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. <br />Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, <br />subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a <br />variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the <br />affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary <br />use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. <br />According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The <br />applicant is proposing to construct a new single family home in a residential lot which <br />is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. The lot width and lot area variances are <br />consistent with the general intent of the ordinance. Due to the unique grading on the <br />street side of the lot and the dip in the shoreline on the lakeside. The building footprint <br />of the lot is constrained. The 75 foot lakeyard setback and hardcover seem reasonable <br />and in harmony. The Planning Commission should discuss the general intent of the <br />average lakeshore setback variance request. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a <br />permit for a new single family residence in a residential zone that is moving farther <br />away from the lake then the existing home is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not <br />permitted by the official controls; The property owner is proposing to use the <br />property in a reasonable manner by replacing the existing residence with a new <br />home which has less hardcover then existing and the new home will be moved <br />3 feet farther from the lake compared to the existing home; but the size and <br />width of the lot is below the minimum lot size standards of the Zoning Code. <br />