Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #LA18-000006 <br />2/20/2018 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but <br />is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. In the opinion of staff, granting of the <br />lot area and lot width variances will alleviate a practical difficulty by allowing the <br />property to be developed under the same hardcover and structural coverage <br />allowances as other similar -sized developed lots in the neighborhood. <br />The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. <br />Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the <br />impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use <br />permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. <br />Practical Difficulties Statement <br />Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit A, and <br />should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Analysis <br />The City code identifies a 35% maximum hardcover for Tier 3 districts on the Stormwater Quality <br />Map. The shoreland overlay district highlights the importance for protecting lakes and waterways <br />and allows for development in small nonconforming lots to not exceed 25%. Allowing a lot area <br />and lot width variance permits the parcel to meet the Tier 3 standards of 35% hardcover. Staff <br />feels a Tier 3 parcel which does not abut the lake or any waterways, meets the intent and purpose <br />of the comprehensive plan and will not create any negative impacts. <br />Public Comments <br />To date, no public comments have been received. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br />property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br />Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character of the neighborhood? <br />Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Planning Staff Recommendation <br />Staff finds there to be practical difficulties inherent with the property due to its size and width in <br />the RR -113 District. The applicant's property had contained a single family residence for many <br />decades. The ability to have the same type of hardcover amenities as other existing developed <br />properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area and width variances are not granted. <br />If the commission concurs, a recommendation for approval should be made for the presented <br />application. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A. <br />Practical Difficulties Documentation Form <br />Exhibit B. <br />Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan <br />Exhibit C. <br />Proposed Plans and Elevations <br />Exhibit D. <br />Submitted Hardcover Calculations <br />Exhibit E. <br />Project Narrative <br />Exhibit F. <br />Property Owners List and Map <br />