My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-12-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2018
>
03-12-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 10:54:09 AM
Creation date
5/24/2019 10:45:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE #LA18-000006 <br />2/20/2018 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not <br />permitted by the official controls; The property owner is proposing to use the <br />property in a reasonable manner but the size of the lot is below the minimum <br />lot size standards of the Zoning Code. <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; <br />The plight of the property owner is due to the existing substandard lot size, <br />which is a result of the property being platted as part of the 'Minnetonka Bluffs' <br />subdivision in 1887, long before local zoning codes were in effect; and <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The 'Minnetonka <br />Bluffs' neighborhood consists of 50 foot lots but most have been combined so <br />most lots range from 100-200 feet in width and ranging in depth. Over time a <br />majority of these lots have each been developed for individual homes. In the <br />opinion of staff, a single family residence and associated amenities on a single <br />lot in this neighborhood will not be inconsistent with the character of the <br />surrounding neighborhood. <br />Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be <br />granted as follows: <br />4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic <br />considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />S. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as <br />defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br />78. This condition is not applicable. <br />6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under <br />Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br />located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family home is an allowed <br />use in the RR -16 District. <br />7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. The lot area, lot width, setback, hardcover <br />and lot coverage standards applying to this property are similar to those of other <br />properties in the neighborhood, and there are many similar sized developed lots in the <br />neighborhood. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br />the land is located. The standards applicable to this property apply to all other property <br />in the neighborhood; however, in order to be allowed the 35% hardcover that other <br />developed similar -sized lots are afforded, a variance to lot area and width is required. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. In the opinion of staff, the property rights of <br />the owner will be diminished if the lot area and lot width variances are not granted, as <br />the new residence would not be able to have the 35% hardcover that neighboring <br />similar -sized lots are allowed. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort <br />or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting of <br />the area and width variances would not impair health, safety, comfort or morals and <br />would not be contrary the intent of the zoning code. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.