Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #18-3997 <br />16 Jan 2018 <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />Practical Difficulties Analysis <br />The subject home was constructed in the 1950's and predates the contemporary lake and <br />sightline protection rules. The owners intend to keep the existing home yet wish to make <br />improvements to better suit their family's needs and to modernize the structure. Staff finds <br />practical difficulties exist which support granting the requested variances to improve the home. <br />Public Comments <br />Comments have been received and are attached as Exhibit G. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br />property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br />2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character of the neighborhood? <br />3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the <br />impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? <br />4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Planning Staff Recommendation <br />Planning staff recommends approval. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A. Application & Narrative <br />Exhibit B. <br />Practical Difficulties Documentation Form <br />Exhibit C. <br />Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan <br />Exhibit D. <br />Proposed Plans and Elevations <br />Exhibit E. <br />Site Photos <br />Exhibit F. <br />Aerial Photos <br />Exhibit G. <br />Submitted Hardcover Calculations <br />Exhibit H. <br />Neighbor Comments <br />Exhibit 1. <br />60 -Day Extension <br />Exhibit J. <br />Property Owners List <br />Exhibit K. <br />Plat Map <br />