Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #18-3997 <br />16 Jan 2018 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be <br />granted as follows: <br />4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic <br />considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as <br />defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br />78. This condition is not applicable. <br />6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under <br />Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br />located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for improvements to a residential <br />structure is an allowed use in the LR -1A Zoning District. <br />7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. The extreme curve of the shoreline resulting <br />in the average lakeshore setback which encumbers the subject property. The proximity <br />of the existing home to the lake is an existing condition setback of the subject home <br />and is generally not in character with the immediate neighborhood. This criterion is <br />met. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br />the land is located. The shoreline's curve results in the extreme average lakeshore <br />setback which encumbers the subject property. The proximity of the existing home to <br />the lake is an existing condition setback of the subject home and is not in character with <br />all of the homes the immediate neighborhood. This criterion is met. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. Due to the location of the house and the <br />applied setbacks, no improvement which expand beyond the existing footprint and <br />walls of the existing home can be done without variances. This criterion is met. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort <br />or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the <br />requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor <br />will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, <br />but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The shoreline, topography, and <br />location of the subject home as well as the adjacent homes create practical difficulties <br />affecting the Property; the variances are necessary and not merely serve as a <br />convenience to the owners. This criterion is met. <br />The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. <br />Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the <br />impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use <br />permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. <br />Practical Difficulties Statement <br />Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and <br />should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br />