My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2018
>
02-12-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 10:32:01 AM
Creation date
5/24/2019 10:20:16 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, January 16, 2018 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Approximately 30 years ago the City installed a new sanitary sewer line on the east side of the property <br />and Ms. Schommer provided an easement to the City. As part of that process, two stubs were provided to <br />the properties on the south side with the assumption the properties could be built on at some point in the <br />future. <br />Knaeble indicated he did hold a neighborhood meeting and that two people showed up aside from Mary <br />Schommer and Ralph Kempf. In addition, a mailing was sent out to approximately 50 residents in the <br />area. In discussions with them, they appeared to be in favor of what is being proposed. The neighbor on <br />the west side was in support of having the flexibility to do the 20 -foot front setback to keep the properties <br />and the homes in line with each other. The neighbor on the east had a question about some existing trees. <br />It was determined the trees are on his property and will not be impacted. One other neighbor showed <br />support but was unable to be at the meeting tonight. That neighbor indicated she would send an email <br />expressing her support. <br />Knaeble requested that they be allowed some flexibility on the project and that the Planning Commission <br />recommend approval on their application. <br />Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:12 p.m. <br />IRE& MV <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Chair Thiesse continued the public hearing to February 12. <br />Thiesse stated his biggest concern that he would like addressed prior to the City Council meeting is tree <br />preservation. Both the City's stormwater plan and Comprehensive Plan talk about tree preservation, but <br />the proposed grading plan shows that none of the trees on the south end will be preserved. <br />Leskinen stated the noncontiguous has its challenges but the Planning Commission has discussed that in <br />the past. Leskinen asked if there will be a homeowners' association. <br />Curtis indicated the City would require an easement over the rain gardens. Curtis stated she does not <br />believe a homeowners' association is necessary since there will not be a private road to be plowed and <br />only three lots are being developed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.