Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, January 16, 2018 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />well within the hardcover limitation of 35 percent. Each of the lots are subject to a 20 percent structural <br />coverage limitation. <br />The City's consulting engineer has provided comments regarding this proposed plat with regard to <br />stormwater management and drainage concerns. Some of those proposals require additional action or <br />plan revisions by the developer. The developer should contact the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District <br />and provide confirmation regarding the permits or approvals they will require for this subdivision. <br />The developer is requesting flexibility to accomplish their development goals. The flexibility is able to be <br />accomplished via the creation of a Planned Residential District overlay. The mechanism for establishing <br />a PRD is the conditional use permit process which establishes an overlay district accommodating the <br />desired flexibility. The PRD process could provide the framework for development of the lots which <br />meet the half acre standard albeit with noncontiguous acreage and the requested reduced front setbacks <br />with conditions. <br />The Planning Commission should discuss the merits of platting as a PRD based on the requests for front <br />yard setback reductions and noncontiguous lot area minimums for Lots 2 and 3 as well as the proposed <br />right-of-way width to be dedicated on Northern Avenue. <br />Staff recommends approval in accordance with the recommendations of the City Engineer as well as the <br />requirements of the MCWD. <br />The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. <br />David Knaeble, Applicant, stated they are proposing to subdivide this property into three residential lots <br />and that he has been working with the current property owner, Mary Schommer, who is aware of the <br />project and had brought it forward initially as a sketch plan review. <br />Knaeble noted Staff has already touched on a few items that they are requesting on this subdivision. One <br />is flexibility to the dry contiguous requirement and then the other is with respect to the front setback, <br />which is required in order to create the three lots that are being requested. <br />