02-11-2019 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Jake Reilly, Sector Representative February 12, 2019 Incompleteness Response been adjusted. Since open water is not a land use, that has been removed from the tables. Though the land uses are the same, some of the titles between the table and map do not match. • If land uses in the Existing Land Use section, specifically Rural Preserve, Rural Residential, and Island Residential are not expected to develop further, then the text should not read as if additional housing units are possible in those areas. Response: The city does not anticipate these land uses to expand, but we do anticipate that, due to their size and/or configuration, some lots may accommodate subdivision, provided each new lot meets or exceed the lot width and area requirements of the applicable zoning district. Planned Land Use • The land use titles in Table 3B-3, should be consistent with those used in the Planned Land Use Map on Map 3B-3a. Though the land uses are the same, some of the titles between the table and map do not match. Response: Table 3B-3 has been updated. • The MUSA Expansion section (Part 4B, page 13) states that the City proposes a minor expansion of the MUSA and that additional expansion will be determine over time. It is unclear where this expansion is proposed. The Plan should specifically identify which properties are proposed, and also under what conditions the City would consider additional expansions. Response: The property proposed to be added was illustrated on Map 4B-2. Additional text is added the MUSA expansion page 4B-13. Conditions upon which the City will consider expansion to MUSA is outlined on Table 4B-12. Wastewater (Roger Janzig, 651-602-1119) • The statement in Part 4B, Page 2 last paragraph must be revised to state: "Potential future demands on regional capacity will be primarily from the retrofitting of existing rural residential neighborhoods where sewer is readily available and where residents are willing to pay the costs associated with its installation; and it is within the MUSA." Response: Text added. • The Plan does not include a local sanitary sewer system map. The system map should include pipe type (gravity or force Main), and pipe diameter. Response: Map 4B-3 has been updated. Map 3B-4 "Planned Development Sites" identifies the "2040 MUSA" or planned regional wastewater service area via map shading using a pale-yellow color which is difficult to identify in both electronic and print formats. Revise map so that these areas are easily identifiable. Response: The boundary line of the MUSA was added. We did add parcel boundaries for clarity. • Local lift station capacities were given in Table 4B-1. Their current design flow was not stated. Given the fact that the City is predominately served by local lift stations (44 in total), the requirement to provide capacities and design flow for the trunk sewers can be waived. However, each lift stations design flow needs to be added. Response: Table 4B-1 was amended to add lift station design flow. • Flow projections by Metropolitan Interceptor facility was included in the