My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-29-1982 Council Meeting Minutes - Board of Review Reconvened
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
06-29-1982 Council Meeting Minutes - Board of Review Reconvened
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2019 7:55:34 AM
Creation date
5/22/2019 7:55:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
page 2 <br /> ' � Reconvened 1982 <br /> Board of Review <br /> June 29 , 1982 <br /> 4. George Grooms <br /> 3065 North Shore Drive <br /> 09-117-23 32 0001 <br /> Mr. Grooms felt that the valuation of $146, 300 placed <br /> on his property is too high for the 70 feet of lakeshore <br /> he owns. Mr. Grooms felt that properties with a large <br /> amount of lakeshore were being assessed less than the <br /> smaller properties. Monk and Hilk explained the theory <br /> of the practice of site valuation and wholesale <br /> effect of additional property. Motion by Van Nest <br /> seconded by Butler to accept the valuation of $146, 300 <br /> as stated by the assessor. Motion carried. <br /> 5. William J. Sime <br /> 2106 Shadywood Road <br /> 17-117-23 42 0017 <br /> Mr. Sime stated he wanted the County Assessor to use <br /> the cash equivalency appraisal method. The Mayor stated <br /> that cash equivalency is great but the equalization <br /> of properties is also important because of the resulting <br /> tax from the budgets. <br /> County Commissioner Bud Robb stated that hundreds of <br /> people were before the Hennepin County Board of Commis- <br /> sioners budget hearings asking and pleading for more <br /> money, only one person asked them to hold the line <br /> on spending. <br /> Van Nest had reviewed the property and felt the assessor' s <br /> valuation of $185,500 was correct. Motion by Van Nest <br /> seconded by Butler to accept the $185,500 valuation as <br /> correct. Motion Carried. <br /> - 6. Howard Meagher <br /> 3980 Dahl Road <br /> 08-117-23 23 0001 <br /> The valuation had been reduced to $150,900 after a re- <br /> valuation. Mr. Meagher felt the valuation was still <br /> too high. Motion by Van Nest seconded by Adams to accept <br /> the assessor' s value in the amount of $150,900. Motion <br /> carried. <br /> 7. Edith Allen <br /> 2118 Shadywood Road <br /> 17-117-23 42 0016 <br /> No further comments. Motion by Van Nest seconded by <br /> Butler to accept the value of $146,000 as placed on the <br /> property by the assessor. �lotion carried. <br /> 8. Evelyn Trutnau <br /> 2264 Shadywood Road <br /> 17-117-23 43 0124 <br /> No further comments. Motion by Van Nest seconded by <br /> Butler to accept the assessor' s valuation of $91 , 400. <br /> Motion carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.