Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#19-28 <br /> May 20,2019 <br /> Page 5 of 5 <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br /> property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the <br /> essential character of the neighborhood? <br /> 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the <br /> impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? <br /> 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Planning Staff Recommendation <br /> The Planning Commission should determine if the standards are adequately satisfied. Practical <br /> difficulty appears to be satisfied, and the property on a true peninsula could support uniqueness; <br /> Though the need for the variance to support a "substantial property right" fails to recognize that <br /> the property has been improved with a single family dwelling, and a dock may be installed on the <br /> east side. <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> Exhibit A. Application <br /> Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form <br /> Exhibit C. Ivy Place Final Plat <br /> Exhibit D. Hardcover Analysis <br /> Exhibit E. Section 82-256 <br /> Exhibit F. Section 78-1370 <br /> Exhibit G. Ivy Place Street <br /> Exhibit H. Plans provided as part of plat review <br /> Exhibit I. Public Notice Information <br />