My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-15-2019 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2019
>
04-15-2019 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2019 8:00:42 AM
Creation date
5/21/2019 8:00:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday,April 15,2019 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> it is going to work and be a success for the community. McCutcheon stated he would be in favor of the <br /> IUP. <br /> Barnhart stated his recommendation is to recommend approval of the IUP and move that forward and then <br /> table the preliminary plat,Master Site Plan, and zoning. <br /> Barnhart stated the IUP just has to do with the grading and transport of material. <br /> Gettman asked whether the IUP could have any conditions attached to it, such as lowering the number of <br /> units. <br /> Barnhart stated the IUP would allow the developer to transport the fill and also apply for a grant to clean <br /> up the site. Barnhart stated the IUP is not tied to the building. <br /> Gettman stated the number of units has gone from 190 units to 240 and is not much different from the <br /> golf course where a number of citizens were upset over the amount of homes being proposed for the site. <br /> Thiesse noted the site is zoned for high density. <br /> Ressler stated the Planning Commission would be approving cleanup of the site and not the number of <br /> units tonight. <br /> Erickson moved,Ressler seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. LA19-000025, <br /> Lakewest, LLC,3245 Wayzata Boulevard West,granting of an Interim Use permit,subject to Staff <br /> recommendations and comments by the MPCA,and further subject to approval of a development <br /> agreement. VOTE: Ayes 7,Nays 0. <br /> Gettman stated he would like to include a traffic management study and to include conversations with the <br /> school. <br /> Barnhart noted the applicant did not prepare a traffic study and that the City Engineer has not <br /> recommended one at this point. <br /> Gettman stated in his view it would help with questions concerning the cul-de-sac, ingress and egress, and <br /> traffic studies. <br /> Barnhart noted the Code requires a cul-de-sac and that this development should have a cul-de-sac. <br /> Gettman noted his commented about the cul-de-sac related more to the other development with the <br /> hammerhead next to this project. <br /> Barnhart noted that has already been approved. <br /> Thiesse asked where the cul-de-sac should be located. <br /> Barnhart indicated it should be located in the area of the private road. <br /> Thiesse stated he thought Staff wanted it down on the south end. <br /> Page 27 of 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.