My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-1991 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
11-20-1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2019 8:53:40 AM
Creation date
4/30/2019 8:53:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUT ES OF THE STUBBS BAY SEWER HEARING — NOVEMBER 20, 1991 <br />look closely at the criteria for being involved in the project. <br />He wanted the lateral to be run down the street to avoid tree <br />loss. <br />Cook noted that could be done. <br />Klitzke noted that all Oxford residents oppose the project. He <br />felt there was no need to fix a problem that doesn't exist. He <br />felt that those not meeting the restrictions of the ordinance <br />should be forced to do so. <br />Goetten noted that the City has hired a septic inspector who will <br />be involved with these issues. She noted the City does follow up <br />on complaints by neighbors regarding septic problems. <br />Klitzke felt that was good and the citizens needed that kind of <br />support. He noted the long —term fix can be expensive. <br />Jabbour explained that Oxford Road and Cygnet Place came in at <br />the end of the study, and he would need further clarification <br />from staff that the areas need sewer before he would vote for it <br />in those areas. <br />Goetten noted that Oxford Road was included because the lots are <br />on lakeshore. She too concurred with Jabbour regarding the need <br />for sewer*in this area. <br />Arnie Robins, 3211 Bayside Road, agreed with the Oxford Road <br />residents. He noted that he has a 3 —year old house and wanted to <br />know why Fox Bend plat and the church weren't included. <br />Goetten explained the Council has considered criteria for <br />inclusion /exclusion. <br />Teri Robins felt that Fox Bend should be assessed for possible <br />future hookup. <br />Butler noted they won't get the benefit of the project. <br />Robins µnoted that because they were putting in miles of pipe, <br />they may as,well benefit and they should have to pay. <br />Jabbour noted he had a hard time requiring a new development that <br />has been required to provide for primary and alternate septic <br />testing to also be required to hook up to sewer. He noted that <br />if they are to hook up at a later date, they will have to pay for <br />it at that time. <br />Klitzke noted that about 40 homes will not increase in value the <br />amount of the assessment, and this concern needs to be addressed. <br />He felt that the Council needs to decide how to finance the <br />project and doesn't feel that how it was done in the past is <br />necessarily the best way to go about it now. <br />T. Robins asked what outside funds have been looked at. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.