Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE STUBBS BAY SEWER HEARING — NOVEMBER 20;.1991 <br />Esters felt that a compromise could be made that 50% of the <br />project be paid by all at first and then as hook ups are made as <br />systems fail, the additional 50% be paid. <br />Butler felt it would be hard to convince the bank that the bill <br />would ever get paid. <br />Esters noted it would be easier for property owners if the cost <br />were segmented. <br />Gaffron reviewed the fees: trunk and lateral fees to be <br />assessed, SAC charge to be paid when hooked up, permit fee and <br />contractor cost for connection. He felt that deferring <br />connections would lead to the City requiring hookup as systems <br />fail and the property owner claiming they do not have the money <br />to hookup at that time. <br />Jabbour noted the City doesn't have the money to fund the <br />project, and would sell bonds which need to be repaid from the <br />assessment income. <br />Tom Kuehn, Finance Director, said a general obligation bond can <br />be assessed at a certain percentage, with the rest being levied. <br />Additional charges could be assessed later. The City in effect <br />could defer those costs. <br />Levering suggested a deadline of hookup within 10 years after <br />project has been started to insure compliance.. <br />Blanch felt it would make the project more palatable. <br />Jabbour asked what would happen if a person protests the <br />assessment at a later date as not receiving any benefit. <br />Callahan felt that maybe it could be worked out. He felt they <br />need to balance the financing to make it generally fair to all <br />affected owners. Perhaps it could be deferred if the need was <br />not current. He noted the City does have restrictions when they <br />levy a bond and it cannot be tailored to individual needs. He <br />noted that right now 2 areas need sewer, and something needs to <br />be done. <br />Mayor Peterson invited questions from the Oxford area. <br />Shaw asked again about the route of the lateral, and suggested by <br />going down the road it would save trees. <br />Gaffron noted that the way it stands, 2 lots abutting Oxford Road <br />would not be served. <br />Klitzke felt that the Council needs to consider adding to the <br />project those 5 extra units in the Oxford /Leaf Street area. He <br />also commented on the recent subdivision to the east which has <br />created 2 drainageways through the Oxford plat, which creates a <br />bigger problem for those residents. He felt that they should <br />11 <br />