My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-28-1991 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
01-28-1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2019 8:25:14 AM
Creation date
4/30/2019 8:25:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 1991 <br />POLICE CHIEF SELECTION CONTINUED <br />Mayor Peterson stated that Council's worksheets will be <br />completed by Februarj 4th. <br />FACILITIES WORKSHOP <br />Goetten questioned whether Council would have sufficient <br />time to accomplish what needed to be done with respect to the <br />Facilities Committee role, if any, prior to the expiration date <br />of the land option agreement. She said, "I think if we hold this <br />meeting in the middle of March, it may be too late." <br />Bernhardson explained that <br />indicated because it allowed time <br />filled. <br />Mayor Peterson asked Council <br />workshop. She suggested the Pla <br />Group and Council. <br />he had suggested the dates <br />for the Council position to be <br />who they wish to have at this <br />nning Commission, the Citizens <br />Jabbour said, "It seems to me that the Council has very <br />strong feelings about the facilities. It may be appropriate for <br />Council to share their views with the Committee, rather than <br />having the Committee out in left field." <br />Callahan stated that Council must select a site first, and <br />then determine whether the scheme that has been shown represents <br />the size building we would like to have. He said, "Mayor <br />Petersen and I have never felt strongly about having all of the <br />buildings on one site. Cost seems to be the major factor. It <br />seems to me that if we determine that the scheme that has been <br />shown to us is larger than we actually believe we need, then it <br />would shed a different light on the cost of the building because <br />the square footage may be less. We have been told the building <br />will cost $85.00 /s.f. to construct." <br />Goetten said, "I have been told that $85.00 /s.f. is fairly <br />extravagant.' I would like to see if there are other options. <br />People are paying taxes through the nose. We need to assure them <br />that we have explored every option and that the proposal is the <br />most cost effective." <br />Mayor Peterson stated that the issue of operating cost <br />differences between they Highway 12 and Crystal Bay locations has <br />never been discussed. <br />Jabbour said, "We need to determined if the City of Long <br />Lake should be asked whether they wish to share our public works <br />facility. That may be a driving factor in the where the facility <br />is located.. Long Lake has indicated that they may wish to share <br />our facility, but they do not want it located on Casco Point. We <br />need to provide the Facilities Committee with a list before they <br />go shopping." <br />X40= <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.