My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-24-1992 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
08-24-1992 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2019 3:42:12 PM
Creation date
4/29/2019 3:42:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD AUGUST 24, 1992 <br />2112,SUGARWOODS DRIVE — CONT. <br />Larson felt the dri.ve provides character for the site and <br />additional enhancement for the Sugarwoods project. He advised he Crimson <br />w i l l be pJanting 9 <br />seasonal Green <br />ants a along dthe Spruce a f front. He requested <br />Maple, along with P <br />approval for realignment for the driveway. <br />Jabbour asked, if the lot area coverage calculation includes <br />driveways. <br />Mabusth advised it does and persons building within Sugarwoods are <br />allowed up to 80% coverage within the building envelope area. She <br />stated there is not' a lot coverage problem.on this property. Commison <br />Jabbour felt the presentation changed tfrom <br />has phacedamoregemphassslon <br />to the Council. He noted the app <br />saving existing vegetation, which is important to Orono. <br />Larson stated he d i d not have i ss i'on time <br />they td i d notarhave <br />presentation for the Planning Comm <br />enough time to properly review the issue. <br />Jabbour felt that was.unfair to the Planning Commission. <br />Larson agreed and said the Planning Commission also let him know <br />that. <br />Jabbour sa i d i t wou I d be a s I ap i n the face i f the Counc i I reversed <br />their decision, since .the Planning Commission was in an unfair <br />situation to begin with. <br />Goetten asked if builders are notified of the need for special <br />permission to realign the driveway in.this development. <br />Mabusth indicated the builder is supplied with this information at <br />the time the building permit application i-s submitted and prior to <br />approval. She asked them to refer to Exhibit G, the supplemental <br />sheet provided all builders within Sugarwoods development. <br />Jabbour asked if the realigned drive had been installed? <br />Mabusth noted work on the driveway was started, but the Inspector <br />stopped work on the project. <br />Goetten asked if trees will be destroyed with the straight <br />alignment. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.