My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-13-1992 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
07-13-1992 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2019 3:37:34 PM
Creation date
4/29/2019 3:37:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD JULY 13, 1992 <br />(#6)'#1742 JAMES & AMY LAING, <br />500 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD - <br />VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3139 <br />Mr. and Mrs. Laing were present. <br />Moorse explained that this is an application to allow the <br />construction of a family room /garage addition replacing an 'existing <br />detached garage, and for a bedroom addition to the south side of <br />the residence. <br />It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution <br />#3139 for Application #1742-for James and Amy Laing, 500 Orono <br />Orchard Road, approving variances to construct additions to the <br />existing residence.. Ayes 3, nays 0. <br />( #7) #1743 ALBERT HANSER, <br />1685 FOX STREET - <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3140 <br />Goetten stated she attended the Planning Commission meeting at <br />which this application was last reviewed. She said Orono's past <br />policy has been to allow non - conforming structures with the <br />condition they meet current code for any structural repairs. She <br />noted the applicant has reduced the subdivision from a 5 lot to a <br />3 lot division. At the last meeting, the Planning Commission <br />changed their original decision and recommended the applicant <br />remove the two non - conforming structures, the shed and tennis <br />court. She disagreed with the Planning Commission's decision. She <br />asked about the driveway.- <br />Mabusth clarified that the Planning Commission recommended that the <br />drive be allowed to remain with the appropriate variance approval. <br />Goetten asked about park dedication. <br />Mabusth reported that the a bike trail easement will be taken along <br />the property line, and an adjustment to the park dedication fee. <br />will be figured for such easement. <br />It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution <br />#3140 for Application #1743,. Albert Hanser, 1685 Fox Street, <br />approving the preliminary subdivision with the appropriate. <br />amendment to, the conditions of the resolution regard "ing the non - <br />conforming structures. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.