Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD MAY 11, 1992 <br />( #9)' #1730 GREG MALIK, <br />3060 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3120 <br />Greg Malik was present. <br />Moorse explained this is application for a two lot preliminary <br />subdivision. The applicant will be living in the existing <br />residence until the new residence is completed, which may cause <br />some problem as far as the septic system is concerned. <br />Malik said he discussed the parcels with Steve Schirmers who <br />confirmed two new on -site septic sites on each of the proposed <br />lots. The road to the new residence will go over the existing <br />septic system. The new primary site for the lot is on the west <br />side and half way up the hill and the secondary site is in front <br />of the house, but too close to the existing well. Schirmers stated <br />there would be no problem installing the septic system at the <br />primary location by using a half horse motor instead of a third <br />horse motor to pump the sewage up the hill. <br />Goetten noted the concerns expressed at the Planning Commission <br />meeting were the primary and alternative septic sites for both <br />lots. <br />Malik stated that he is hoping to sell the front lot off and felt <br />his chance of selling the parcel may be better with the existing <br />home left on it. <br />Jabbour noted he should. be allowed to live in the existing <br />residence for as long as he wants provided the house is connected <br />to an acceptable septic system. <br />Mabusth stated she would need confirmation of the primary and <br />alternate septic sites for both lots. <br />Malik noted he could use the alternate site by capping the existing <br />well. He said he was anxious to sell off the additional lot. <br />Mabusth noted. this condition should be included within the <br />developers agreement to ensure compliance and noted that the lot <br />cannot be sold without a conforming septic system. <br />Malik asked if that requirement could be changed to "the house <br />cannot be occupied without a conforming septic system ". He stated <br />he did not want to expend additional money if the future property <br />owner was going to remove the existing house. <br />5 <br />