My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-23-1992 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
03-23-1992 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2019 1:22:42 PM
Creation date
4/29/2019 1:22:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f <br />z <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 23, 1992 <br />PRESENTATION BY FRANK HORSTEIN - CONT. <br />consideration the issues of the fly, ash, long term testing and the <br />plant. <br />Mayor Peterson asked how many of the other ten communities have <br />indicated their support in theory to this project. <br />Hornstein responded that only recently have they learned of the <br />movement and have spoken only to Medina and now to Orono. <br />Mayor Peterson asked Fred Gustin representing Metropolitan Services <br />for comments. <br />Fred Gustin identified himself as Senior Project Engineer with <br />Municipal Services Corporation based in Atlanta, Georgia, and a <br />subsidiary of U.S. P.C.I. which is based in Huston, Texas, which is a <br />subsidiary of Union Pacific Railroad with $13,000,000,000.00 in assets <br />based in,Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. For the last four years his company <br />has been working with the Hennepin County Board on developing the use <br />of the ash from the incinerator. His own background is as a Utility <br />Engineer for Wisconsin Electric Power Company and managed <br />approximately 250,000'tons per year of coal fly ash and found that it <br />was successful to market the coal fly ash.' He went south to work for <br />a consulting company that specialized in coal ash utilization and <br />feels it has a great deal of potential. In response to Mr. <br />Hornstein's three- comments: The pilot plant in Atlanta produced 100 <br />tons of fly ash about two years ago. Since then representative <br />samples were taken from an independent company and according to MPCA <br />requirements the aggregate was ground down and tested. The test <br />period for the fly ash in the 100 tons has passed the MPCA standards. <br />At the end of five years the MPCA will look at the data supplied to <br />them and will make a decision as to what to do with this roadway. It <br />can either be brought to a disposal site or if the roadway is holding <br />up, it can continue to be monitored. On a permitting process, because <br />of the experience in Dayton, it has been decided to slow down the <br />whole process. Even though they feel it is a good idea, his company <br />has no intention of beginning construction of a.plant after two years <br />because of the necessity to perform an environmental impact statement <br />first. <br />Jabbour questioned why Orono, was asked to be involved and expressed <br />remorse after further checking into this matter. <br />Goetten agreed and stated that Orono has always prided itself in being <br />an environmentally concerned city. <br />Maryann Campo addressed the Council and explained that she is a <br />citizen who resides in Hennepin County. She is opposed. to Hennepin <br />County siting more land fills and feels other uses should be found for <br />waste materials. Campo feels a decision should be made to allow <br />testing for new products under strict monitoring. <br />Moorse added that Orono's correspondence supported moving ahead with <br />MPCA testing. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.