My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-24-1992 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
02-24-1992 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2019 1:21:36 PM
Creation date
4/29/2019 1:21:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD FEBRUARY 24, 1992 <br />t <br />MAYOR /COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. <br />Goetten stated that both she and Moorse drafted a letter to MnDot <br />expressing-that same position. She noted that Mr. Hay would be <br />around through the Scoping Document process. <br />Jabbour noted that the Mayor of Independence was there and Jabbour <br />indicated to hi.m his discomfort with the joint powers agreement <br />between Maple Plain and Long Lake. <br />C) Jabbour stated not ,much Is getting done at the Facility <br />Committee meetings and noted he is confused about the size of the <br />Committee and the necessity of all to be in attendance before a <br />decision can be made. <br />Callahan stated that the last meeting was called at the request of <br />the architect to approve the detailed plans so they could be sent <br />out for bid. He noted the architect did not attend the meeting, <br />and currently they do not have approved plans to be sent out. He <br />stated that last fall a vdry strict time •table was established, <br />which stated this was to be done by March 1st. He stated that the <br />architect was responsible for getting the job done, and before he <br />would approve any progress payments to the architect, he wanted to <br />see progress on the project. <br />Goetten felt the meetings have become too casual and there is a <br />need for a Council member to be in charge of being the Liaison <br />between the Committee and the Council. <br />Callahan pointed out at the last meeting it was brought up that <br />large amounts of money would need to be spent, but no one seemed <br />r <br />to realize what the expenditures were for. <br />Goetten reiterated that the total cost of the project would not <br />exceed $4,000,.000 as originally established, and the contingency <br />fund would not be spent for the new facilities. <br />Jabbour noted the criteria for additional items would be "must have <br />and cannot live without ". <br />Mayor Peterson noted it was distressing to hear of problems with <br />the project with no solutions. <br />Moorse agreed with Callahan that plans were to be reviewed at the <br />February 18th meeting of the Committee, but they were not supplied. <br />He noted they intended.to inform the Committee at that time of a <br />possible soils correction problem, but the Committee.was not asked <br />j to make a decision on such.probiem. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.