My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-24-1992 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
02-24-1992 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2019 1:21:36 PM
Creation date
4/29/2019 1:21:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD FEBRUARY 24, 1992 <br />MAYOR /COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. <br />Mayor Peterson noted It was implied at that meeting that there, was <br />a major problem with only one alternative for a solution. <br />Callahan noted that the Committee was promised at the beginning <br />that they would be the deciding body on such decisions. <br />Jabbour asked that a specific agenda be sent to Committee members <br />a week prior to the meeting to allow those who wished to attend to <br />make necessary arrangements to attend the meeting. <br />Callahan noted that Bellows was never informed of the last <br />Committee meeting. <br />Goetten asked If the last meeting was so important, why were they <br />waiting three more weeks to get together. <br />Moorse explained that the lack of a decision by the Committee would <br />not delay the plans for bid. ' <br />Jabbour understood that the public works building was put on hold <br />until the elevation was decided for the other buildings. <br />Moorse explained that after the meeting with the architect and <br />construction manager, the deadline for plans for bid were to be <br />ready by March 16th and bids would arrive back at City Hail by mid - <br />April. He stated that Boarman would be sending him conceptual <br />plans for the audio /visual equipment to be incorporated within the <br />detailed plans. <br />Goetten reminded Moorse to contact the City of Minnetrista for <br />comments on their audio /visual system. <br />Cook explained that.the soils expert felt it necessary to lift the <br />entire project in order to compensate for poor soils. He noted he <br />had explained to public works away to maintain elevation and <br />control drainage. He noted the original design allowed for a low <br />spot in the middle of the driving lane for drainage, but that had <br />been changed to allow drainage in the gutter lines. <br />Jabbour asked why additional fill would be added to raise the <br />elevation rather than remove the poor soils. <br />Cook explained they were concerned with drainage under the parking <br />lot. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.