Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 13, 1995 <br />( #10 - #2066 Robert and Iris Waade - Continued) <br />Gaffron reported that the application was for a number of variances and additions to a <br />home located on the east side of Shoreline Drive. The house is located within the 0 -75' <br />zone. The original proposal was to add a second story to the home with a 10:12 pitched <br />roof. The Planning Commission said that this would be too much for the lot and could <br />not recommend approval. The applicant then came back with a proposal for just a <br />pitched roof over the existing one -story home with a number of additions. The carport <br />area is to be built in and used as living space. The garage would be added onto to create <br />a third stall. There would be a bump out in one area, and the entry way would be <br />squared off. There would also be an angled addition. The roof would also be pitched <br />over the carport area. No height variance is required. <br />The side setback requirement is 30'. The garage is currently at 8' and is proposed at 16'. <br />The carport bump out is located at 19' where 30' is required. The entry way and roof <br />overhang is located in the 0 -75' zone. Regarding the average lakeshore setback line, the <br />house to the north does not view the property. The house to the south already has <br />limited view. The Planning Commission did not feel this was an issue. <br />The hardcover of bituminous walkway located under the deck would be changed to a <br />non - hardcover of gravel with no underlayment. A back out apron and parking area <br />would be created eliminating the loop. Hardcover in the 0 -75' zone would decrease from <br />• 39.18% to 36.14 %. Hardcover in the 75 -250' zone would decrease from 16% to 9.25 %. <br />The lot coverage by structure is proposed at 15.37% where 15% is allowed. <br />Waade noted that the 4' overhangs would be eliminated and rebuilt to 1-1/2'. All of the <br />additions are within the original overhang depth. <br />Hurr asked if there was any way to keep the lot coverage within the 15% allowable. <br />Waade said he made an attempt to do so but was unable to create a functional floor plan. <br />The garage area would be increased from 2 stalls to 3 with one stall being 30' in length. <br />It was noted that there are no storage sheds. on the property. <br />Gaffron reported that the .37% overage in lot coverage amounts to 100 s.f. Hurr said it <br />was her opinion that the lot coverage should meet the 15% allowable. <br />Waade asked if the overhang was considered. Gaffron explained that the overhang is not <br />included in either the hardcover or lot coverage calculations. <br />Goetten said she appreciated the concern with the lot coverage exceeding 15% but <br />looked at the significant improvements to the property. She expressed her appreciation <br />of the proposal. <br />• Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resolution #3633. <br />9 <br />