My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-1995 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
11-13-1995 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2019 9:55:00 AM
Creation date
4/25/2019 9:55:00 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 13, 1995 <br />( #9 - #2065 Scotch Pine Lane - Continued) <br />• <br />proposal P <br />Jabbour said when the ro osal is completed, the road would only be used by two <br />nronerties. not three as it is currently, and would meet code. He also added that the <br />proposal presents a major contribution to hardcover reduction. Gaffron asked that the <br />Council note the findings that this situation is unique if they wish to allow the vacation to <br />occur without setting. a precedent. <br />Gaffron also added that the outlot results in the Marfield property becoming a backlot. It <br />would no longer abut a public or private road but a driveway. This would require <br />meeting the 150% area and setback standard. He also noted the lot sizes of the three <br />parcels. <br />Hurr said she saw no problem with the proposal and asked that the applicants pay for any <br />easement resolution and the vacation. <br />It was noted that this vacation approval is conceptual, and the re -plat requires preliminary <br />approval as well as final approval. <br />Goetten asked Gaffron if he approved of the proposal. Gaffron said he was here to <br />represent the code. From a general concept, he did not feel the proposal met code but <br />would require specific findings for approval in order to avoid setting a precedent that <br />might result in other existing 3 -lot cul -de -sacs asking for the same thing. • <br />Jabbour commented that the property had good drainage. <br />Goetten said if NSP had placed their power lines in the wrong place, it would probably be <br />their responsibility to correct it. Gaffron said he did not believe the power lines would <br />affect the driveway. Toles said that whatever it takes to gain approval to remove the <br />hardcover was satisfactory. Jabbour informed Toles that he should move the easement in <br />case Toles would pursue remodeling of the home in the future. <br />Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to approve preliminary replat, conceptual approval of <br />the vacation of the road, and asked Staff to bring back to Council for final approval <br />noting the property owners to pay for costs incurred. This approval is for Resolution <br />#3632 as drafted. Vote: Ayes 4. Nays 0. Abstain 1. Callahan. <br />( #10) #2066 ROBERT AND ERIS WAADE, 1487 SHORELINE DRIVE - <br />VARIANCES /CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3633 <br />Robert Waade was present. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.