Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 9, 1995 <br />( #1 i - #2071 James and Joann Jundt - Continued) <br />• <br />Crawford said his company was only asked to construct, not design, the project. It is his <br />opinion that this is the tail end of the projects for the property. <br />Hurr noted the number of after- the -fact applications. <br />Mabusth said Staff had asked Kraus Anderson for a comprehensive plan but have only <br />received plans in pieces, such as for the greenhouse, the tuckpointing, the expansion, etc. <br />No floor plans have ever been seen by Staff. <br />Jabbour said the Kraus Anderson representative, in the company of the Jundt son, was <br />asked two meetings ago for an overall plan. The Council then requested the removal of a <br />small portion of the driveway. He is concerned that with bits and pieces of a plan, it <br />makes the Council look unreasonable in their requests. <br />Kelley asked if the City could ask the applicants to appear before the Council themselves <br />with their application. <br />Callahan suggested tabling the application until the overall plan, before and after, has <br />been seen prior to proceeding with this application. <br />• Hun moved, Goetten seconded, to table the application until the overall plan is presented <br />and confirmation received that the driveway portion was removed. <br />0 <br />Callahan received confirmation from Mabusth that the driveway portion had been <br />removed. <br />Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Kelley, who felt this application could be approved with the <br />understanding that no further applications would be considered without an overall plan. <br />Crawford said he was concerned with losing the ability to replace the trees if the <br />application was tabled due to upcoming winter weather. Mabusth said Staff could work <br />out the tree removal and planting issue through a permit. Gaffron noted that the plan <br />calls for the removal of a 36" elm to be replaced with two 4 -1/2" maples. Callahan <br />questioned how Staff could approve the tree removal yet it was part of the resolution. <br />Mabusth clarified that the tree removal and replanting matters are resolved under a Staff <br />issued permit and that Staff needed Council's approval for the excavation. Crawford said <br />the replanting of the trees would only take a couple of days. The ehn tree, itself, has <br />already been removed. <br />7 <br />