My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-09-1995 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
10-09-1995 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2019 9:51:33 AM
Creation date
4/25/2019 9:51:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 9, 1995 <br />( #13 - #2073 William and Susan Dunkley - Continued) • <br />Gaffron reported that the application is for a request for a number of variances for three <br />projects on the Lakeshore property with a channel into Walters Port lagoon. The <br />application is for repair to the driveway, retaining walls, front stoop, as well as other <br />retaining walls. The wood retaining walls along the lakeshore would be replaced as well <br />as the retaining walls along the garage. The front entry is proposed to assist in alleviating <br />water problems. A IO'x33' three - season porch and 10'x16' deck is proposed on the <br />lakeside of the residence. <br />The Planning Commission reviewed the application and recommended partial approval <br />based on replacing the existing wooden retaining walls with modular block retaining <br />walls. The wood retaining walls would have to be removed per the Engineer's <br />recommendation. Gaffron said applicants had sent a letter requesting that a portion of <br />the wood walls be allowed to remain in place since removal would create a stability <br />problem. The front entry was noted to be intended to correct the water problem. The <br />Planning Commission denied the porch and deck as there was no hardship shown and <br />because of the location so near the Lakeshore within the 0 -75' zone. It was further <br />recommended that hardcover of rock with fabric and plastic be removed. There were a <br />few areas along the house and adjacent to the walkway which would remain. <br />Gaffron said Staff concurred with the Planning Commission recommendations. He noted <br />that the porch and deck would have increased the lot coverage by structures from 15.1% . <br />to over 16 %. While attempting to calculate the hardcover, it was found that some areas <br />were not defined. Staff recommended an as -built survey be completed to include the <br />driveway that was recently rebuilt. Based on the initial survey, the new driveway <br />apparently adds about 150 s.f of hardcover. The net would not change considerably with <br />the removal of the rock areas. <br />Goetten asked if the application was made before or after the project begun. Gaffron <br />said the driveway had been started. He told the entryway contractor it would be <br />inappropriate to pour the concrete until the Planning Commission could review the plan. <br />The concrete was poured without regard for this advisory. <br />Hun suggested that the as -built survey be completed prior to any permit being issued. <br />The applicant's landscaping representative commented that it was their attempt to save a <br />large amount of trees and have found it difficult to grow grass in the back corner area. <br />There is a large amount of hostas and other greens. The rock on the side of the house to <br />the lake will be replaced with grass. Hostas and other greenery will be placed on the <br />north side of the house as grass is difficult to grow in this area. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.