Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 9, 1995 <br />( #12 - #2072 Graydon Newman, Jr. - Continued) <br />• <br />Hurr said the property consists of seven parcels and requested the combination of the <br />seven into one tax statement. Gaff Ton said this could be required if it is connected to the <br />variance request. Jabbour commented that the connection is with the ordinance requiring <br />any accessory structure to be on the principal structure lot. <br />Kelley amended the motion to combine the lot containing the dock with the principal <br />structure lot. <br />Goetten asked what the zoning was for the area. After hearing the zoning was LRIB, <br />Goetten asked that all of the lots be combined. <br />Kelley asked for the opinion of the City Attorney. Barrett said the decision is based on <br />what would compel the combination. The combination of the lot with the dock and the <br />principal structure showed a connection, but there was no connection for the remainder <br />of the lots to be combined. <br />Hurr asked Staff to request of the applicant that all of the lots be combined. <br />The motion was amended with approval per the Planning Commission recommendations <br />and modified with the removal of the paving blocks and combination of the parcels <br />• containing the dock and the principal structure. Jabbour seconded. <br />Vote: Ayes 3, Jabbour, Kelley, Callahan; Nays 2, Goetten, Hurr. Goetten said she was <br />for the application but would like to see all of the parcels combined. <br />1�1 <br />Hurr asked that Staff convey to applicant that since two lots must be combined that they <br />combine all of the lots. The Council did not want to hold up the application but <br />requested that a total combination be done. <br />The representative said he would convey the information but felt the combinatin <br />"muddied the waters" and only wished to correct a non - conformity. Jabbour responded <br />that the law prohibits a dock on any land without a principal structure, and no variance <br />could be granted without the combination performed. <br />Hurr noted that there was no cost involved in lot combinations. <br />( #13) #2073 WILLIAM AND SUSAN DUNKLEY, 2709 WALTERS PORT LANE - <br />VARIANCESICUP - RESOLUTION #3619 <br />Gaffron noted the presence of the applicant's representatives. <br />11 <br />