Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD O`T SEPTE +iB :11, 1395 <br />( #7 - 92048 James & Joann Jundt - Continued) <br />• <br />It was noted that this is the sixth application by the applicants. <br />Callahan moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3599. Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />( #8) #2050 WILLIAM TOLES, 3165 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE - <br />RESOLUTION #3600 <br />The applicant was not present but was represented by the realtor for the property. <br />Gaffron reported that the application is for hardcover and average lakeshore setback <br />variances. The property was subject to a variance application in 1988_ The current <br />hardcover calculations match that which were approved in 1988. The proposed pool <br />would be 115' from the shoreline. The average lakeshore setback is defined by the house <br />to the northeast, and the house on the west, which is set back. Gaffron said there would <br />be no impact on these neighboring homes. <br />The hardcover calculations shows 33.1% existing in the 75 -250' zone, where 25% is <br />allowed, and is proposed at 32.6 %. The reduction in hardcover will be acquired through <br />the removal of 1390 s.f of landscape fabric and plastic and 400 s.f of concrete and wood <br />patio. <br />• The pool was looked at as structure. The Planning Commission recommended approval <br />of the application with reductions as noted in hardcover. The applicant was asked to <br />reduce more hardcover if this was possible. <br />is <br />Hun said she saw no problem with the average lakeshore setback but saw no hardship to <br />add to the structural hardcover. Hurr asked if there was anywhere to reduce the amount <br />of hardcover. Gaffron said any fim then removal would affect the house or driveway. <br />It was noted that this application was for a hardcover variance only, not a structural <br />coverage variance. The structural coverage is at 1 1% with the proposed pool. Gaffron <br />said the review of hardcover and structure was made due to the issue of non - structural <br />versus structural hardcover issue with landscape beds and plastic underlayment. <br />Hun asked for clarification of the reduction of non - structural and decking by 400'. <br />Gaffron said the reduction is from a patio 2' above grade. The 400 s. f. in patio would be <br />in exchange for the 1500 s.f. pool. There is a net reduction in non - structural hardcover <br />of 137 s.f with the removal of 1390 s.f of plastic and fabric. <br />5 <br />