My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-10-1995 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
07-10-1995 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2019 9:35:11 AM
Creation date
4/25/2019 9:35:10 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON JULY 10, 1995 <br />• ( #7 - 42029 William Smith - Continued) <br />Callahan said the driveway ordinance is under scrutiny by the Planning Commission to <br />consider a change in the code. Mabusth said if a reclassification were to be done, <br />standards would also be made for driveways and noted this particular driveway does not <br />go anywhere. Planning Commission Chair Peterson had recently asked the Council for <br />direction regarding the ordinance. Jabbour agreed that the Council needs to revisit the <br />ordinance. Callahan voiced a conflict with views from engineering staff and naturalists <br />regarding this issue. Kelley was concerned with the City determining what kind of <br />driveway a landowner could have on their private lot. <br />Kelley opined that if Fox Run were mandated to allow these lots access from Fox Run <br />that the homeowners would come to appreciate it. Kelley cited the Wear road example. <br />If Fox Run were to the same standards, the City would want to make Fox Run public. <br />Callahan said if a variance were granted, instead of an 18' drive with a cul -de -sac, Fox <br />Run should be taken. Goetten questioned if the idea was to condemn Fox Run and noted <br />the need to notify the homeowners. Goetten emphasized the need to establish some <br />rules. <br />Applicant Smith said he has made arrangements, as a result of the Planning Commission <br />recommendations, to widen the road and maintain it. Smith said he is in the process of <br />writing covenants for the road maintenance. The owners of Lot 2 agree with this <br />• recommendation and has a turnaround on their property to handle fire department trucks <br />and heavy equipment. This verbal agreement is in the process of being formalized. Smith <br />said he agrees to provide a larger area on the northern lot for a turnaround and exit for <br />larger vehicles. This area was originally intended for visitor parking. <br />Callahan asked Smith when he acquired the property (May 16, 1995) and received <br />confirmation that Smith was aware of the standard requiring the drive to be upgraded if <br />any further division occurred. Smith elaborated that he felt the proposed driveway <br />upgrade would be the best plan considering having received no cooperation from the <br />homeowners of Fox Run and the impact a new road would have on the land. Smith said <br />the owners of Lot 2 have no interest in gaining access from Fox Run. Jabbour noted that <br />the cost to condemn Fox Run would be assessed to Smith if it occurred. <br />Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution #3577 per the Planning <br />Commission recommendations. Ayes 3, Nays 1, Callahan Nay. <br />Callahan moved, Jabbour seconded, to place a two -month moratorium on any further <br />subdivision application involving the driveway /private road issue, where an upgrade from <br />a driveway to a private road is presently required when a third lot is created on a <br />driveway. This moratorium is to allow time to study the issue. Barrett said a written <br />resolution is required to define the moratorium. Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.