Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 8, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1588 - US WEST NEW VECTOR GROUP CONTINUED <br />power, the beam may have to be shaped and they may need a . <br />secondary tower in another commercial industrially zoned area. <br />He feels this is not the only answer. He also states, "We were <br />told by the City that this is a 2 acre residentially zoned area <br />and I never thought I would come to a Council meeting to see the <br />big guns of US West, especially the attorney, threatening us to <br />say we will put this tower here and litigate if you guys don't <br />approve. I don't think this is the way US West should go about <br />it's business." <br />Bruce Clark, 625 Old Long Lake Road, states he has just <br />spent thousands of dollars on a deck overlooking a very scenic <br />marsh and this tower is unacceptable. <br />Cathy Hollimon added that there was never a neighborhood <br />meeting. The first they heard about this was when someone wanted <br />to take pictures in their back yard and stressed the point that <br />this would be done by the end of this year. <br />Callahan stated that it seems an attempt had been made to <br />contact residents. <br />Mabusth stated that the applicant was using tax records that <br />were about a year old and the Hollimons were new homeowners and <br />didn't get the notice. <br />Steven Champlin, 50 Myrtlewood, also opposes the tower, • <br />primarily for aesthetic reasons. He expressed concern over <br />seeing the tower on the Luce Line as well as from his home. He <br />expressed concern over the hazard of towers to birds. He <br />complimented the US West group in their handling of this matter <br />but does not want to see this tower in their neighborhood. <br />JoEllen Hurr, 930 Partenwood Road, asked if the Church would <br />not lose their tax - exempt status if a commercial operation were <br />on their site. <br />Acting Mayor Callahan responded that it is possible that the <br />income from the project may be taxable but the Church would <br />probably not lose it's status but does not know for sure. <br />Betty Wells, 70 Myrtlewood Road, stated that the Church has <br />changed hands three times since it was built and this group may <br />leave once the tower is built also. <br />Ray Wells, 70 Myrtlewood Road, stated that they do look <br />directly in that direction and would be looking directly at the <br />tower at all times. <br />Gabriel Jabbour, 985 Tonkawa Road, indicated that he and <br />JoEllen Hurr had worked on the original draft of the ordinance in <br />the early 1970's. The intent of the people who wrote the code <br />was that antennas of this kind would not be allowed in Orono. He <br />23 <br />