My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-08-1990 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
10-08-1990 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 12:30:55 PM
Creation date
4/23/2019 12:30:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 8, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1588 US WEST NEW VECTOR GROUP CONTINUED <br />current zoning code allows that a conditional use permit could be • <br />granted for this communication tower. The first provision he <br />refers to is allowing a conditional use permit to be granted for <br />"essential services ". These are traditional public utility <br />services.such as gas lines and utility poles. They believe the <br />communication tower fits in that structure. The Federal <br />Communications Commission has determined that cellular phone <br />systems are in the public interest, regulated at the Federal <br />level and have many of the attributes of a public utility.. <br />Callahan asked, "Is it your impression and belief that the <br />company is a public utility with the rights of condemnation? <br />Mr. Marx replied, "It is not a public utility with rights of <br />condemnation, but we think for the purposes of your zoning code <br />and the way it uses the term essential service, that it qualifies <br />as a public utility for the purpose of your zoning code, that's <br />what we contend. Under that provision, unless it is demonstrated <br />that there is damage to the health and welfare of the community, <br />then the conditional use permit is to be granted." <br />Callahan asked if it isn't the responsibility of the <br />applicant to demonstrate that there is not any damage, not that <br />the City has to demonstrate that there is damage. Mr. Marx <br />agreed. <br />A second provision which would allow the granting of this • <br />conditional use permit is under the public service structure <br />provision. They don't believe this tower will be an accessory <br />use or another principal use on the Church property. This is <br />similar to other utility type uses such as telephone wires and <br />poles and gas lines in that they function along with and are <br />often a part of other types of lots. <br />Callahan asks, "If this is not a principal structure, then <br />it must be an accesory structure." <br />Mr. Marx replied, "We believe it is a public service <br />structure as defined by your zoning code and is not accessory. <br />It is a separate and independent entity defined as a public <br />service structure." <br />Acting Mayor Callahan states, "The public service structure <br />relates to the fact that the principal or accessory structure, as <br />such, is engaged in public service activities, not whether it is <br />a principal structure or an accessory structure and the third <br />category, public service structure, but whether or not the public <br />service structure is an accessory or principal structure. Which <br />of the two do you think it is ?" <br />Mr. Marx does not think the use of principal or accessory • <br />fits in to the definiton of public service structure as' it <br />applies to this situation. For example, power lines running <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.