My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-08-1990 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
10-08-1990 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 12:30:55 PM
Creation date
4/23/2019 12:30:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 8, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1555 - LANDSTAR, INC. CONTINUED <br />• appropriate to ask Landstar for payment. <br />Callahan stated that as the area develops, more boats will <br />be involved and there will be problems with the riparian area <br />along the beach and the LMCD, DNR, etc. will become involved. <br />Mr. MacKinnon said, "I believe our engineer and the City <br />Engineer have looked at some of the questions raised and both <br />have passed on them." Mr. Callahan agreed. <br />Goetten replied that .she has also questioned the <br />buildability of this area. Mabusth stated that the facts <br />indicate this is a buildable area. Goetten has concerns over the <br />houses falling into the wetlands, then who is responsible. <br />Callahan notes that all the engineers have said it wouldn't <br />happen and all these things have passed. Goetten said, "But we <br />have found sometimes engineers aren't correct." . <br />Acting Mayor Callahan stated that a few Council meetings ago <br />that it became apparent this issue would be forthcoming and we <br />look into the matter of wetland protection. The response of the <br />staff seems to be that we don't need any more wetland protection <br />because we have all these codes. It also seems to Callahan that <br />as more of the development gets into poorer land, we are not <br />doing right by the land or community. <br />• Goetten states these are definitely marginal tracts and <br />questions if the Council would be responsible in approving this <br />application. <br />Nettles asked where 26' came from. City Administrator <br />Bernhardson replied that it has been in the City Code for many <br />years and may be a DNR requirement. <br />Mabusth stated that in earlier proposals of PRD's of this <br />property there were up to 20 some units taking credit of the <br />wetlands areas and that would have been a major impact on this <br />property. It would have beeen difficult to deny coming in under <br />Section 10.55 seeking credit of the wetland area. Mabusth <br />suggested Acting Mayor Callahan may be interested in amending <br />code to not give credit to wetlands in sewered area. That may be <br />a way to get control. This developer has proposed a development <br />with 1 acre lots above the 932 elevation. <br />Bernhardson states that one of the concerns is the quality <br />of the soils it is built on. There have been no soil borings <br />actually done within the building pads at this point and is <br />usually determined at a later time. This may address <br />Councilmember Goetten's concerns about buildability of this <br />property. Even though it is outside the wetlands, the soils may <br />• be such that they may not be buildable. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.