Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 13, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1334- REBERS CONTINUED <br />to the Council the Planning Commission's concerns involved with <br />this request and asked that it be monitored closely. He <br />suggested that the resolution allowing any diversion from what <br />the City originally approved be very precise. Chairman Kelley <br />also asked that the Council, in dealing with this matter, once <br />again speak to the developer about the conditions at the corner <br />of Brown Road and Highway 12. The Planning Commission would like <br />to see some kind of plantings or screening around the retention <br />pond." <br />Mayor Grabek asked Bellows what specific concerns the <br />Planning Commission has regarding the recent request. <br />Bellows replied, "We were assured that all trees that were <br />to be preserved would be clearly marked before work began on the <br />site. That is not being done. The Planning Commission is <br />concerned because trees cannot be replaced after - the - fact." <br />Mayor Grabek asked staff to review the concerns raised by <br />Bellows. He asked if the retention pond had been constructed in <br />a manner other than what the developer had proposed. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth replied, "The final seeding is <br />lacking from the retention pond area. However, the City did not <br />request the developer to provide plantings. The developer did <br />not provide much detail on the actual retention pond because it • <br />was located within the commercial outlot set aside for future <br />development. The City did not expect the pond to be as large as <br />it is. The final plat approval only specified that the developer <br />provide ground cover around the retention pond. In fact, City <br />staff would discourage the use of plantings along one side <br />because of a sighting problem that may be created." <br />Gerhardson added, "The City has not completed its project <br />along the west end of the pond and that is contributing to the <br />unsightliness of the area." <br />It was, moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by <br />Councilmember Goetten, to table this item until the September 10, <br />1990 Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes -4, Nays -0. Motion passed. <br />$1473 JACQUELYN KELLY <br />2056 SHADYWOOD ROAD <br />AFTER -THE -FACT VARIANCE <br />REQUEST TO TABLE <br />Bernhardson explained that due to the pending denial and a <br />discrepancy in the hardcover calculations, the applicant has <br />requested that this item be tabled. <br />Councilmember Callahan noted that this matter was first <br />presented some time ago. He questioned why there is still a <br />2 - <br />