My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-09-1990 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
04-09-1990 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 10:22:32 AM
Creation date
4/23/2019 10:22:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
e <br />MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 9, 1990 <br />STUBBS BAY SEWER CONTINUED • <br />their particular case they are being served from a lift station <br />and the line has to come back to Stubbs and up to Eileen Street." <br />Mayor Grabek asked if it was staff's recommendation to <br />include the Whitman property. <br />Bernhardson stated that the Whitmans have 1.8 acres of <br />property and would therefore be included in the project. <br />Callahan noted that a lateral was being installed in that <br />area just for the purpose of serving the Whitmans and they are <br />asking to be excluded. <br />Mayor Grabek asked if Gaffron had in fact confirmed that <br />there are three alternate sites on the Whitman property. <br />Bernhardson replied, " Gaffron said that there is potential, <br />based on the setbacks, but did not commit to three sites being <br />located on the property. There will need to be soil testing done <br />to determine how many alternate sites exist. That criteria <br />should be met before you decide to exclude them." <br />Ms. Julie Harren, 175 Landmark Drive, stated that they just <br />built a house and spent $9,000.00 on a mound system. Ms. Harren <br />did not understand why she was being considered in the project <br />and Oxford'Road was being given an option. • <br />Cook explained that the trunk line would not extend through <br />Oxford Road, but would stop just before it. He said that the <br />trunk line has the capacity to handle Oxford Road if the property <br />owners are interested in being included. A lateral would then run <br />by the individual Oxford properties. <br />Bernhardson added that only the four Oxford properties <br />abutting Bayside Road abut the trunk line. Bernhardson said that <br />the original design was to have the line on the north side. <br />There has been discussion, but in an effort to save trees, no <br />actual design has been drawn showing the line on the south side. <br />Bernhardson said, "We can provide lots of criteria, but <br />there is no perfect solution. Somehow a decision will have to be <br />made as to which properties should be included or excluded. It <br />may have to be done on a case -by -case basis. We have speculative <br />information that indicates the Whitman and Harren properties <br />could be excluded, but until testing is done, it is not wise to <br />exclude them. We need to determine the number of properties that <br />are potentially going to be excluded so that the figures we give <br />out in the petition accurately reflect the cost of the project." <br />Callahan said, "It seems to me we should make every effort <br />possible to exclude the Eileen Street property because it appears • <br />- 15 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.