My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-09-1990 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
04-09-1990 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 10:22:32 AM
Creation date
4/23/2019 10:22:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 9, 1990 <br />• STUBBS BAY SEWER CONTINUED <br />of the Stubbs Bay area if they are interested in participating. <br />A map of the area was displayed showing the properties that staff <br />is recommending for exclusion. In regard to the Christine Drive <br />and Oxford Road areas, staff is recommending that the residents <br />be asked if they wish to participate. If there is sufficient <br />interest, those areas could be included to reduce the trunk costs <br />for everyone included in the project. Our primary concern for <br />keeping the project costs down is the trunk assessment being <br />charged to people because that charge directly affects everybody <br />else in the project. <br />Bernhardson stated that 6 properties had specifically <br />requested exclusion from the project. He reviewed the portion of <br />his memo addressing staff's recommendation for each. <br />Ms. Linda Whitman, 3620 Eileen Street, questioned whether <br />the requirement of 2 acres was as important as having alternate <br />drainfield sites. Ms. Whitman distributed a letter which <br />indicated that their property has three alternate drainfield <br />sites, in addition to a fully functional system. She said, "The <br />assessment for our property would be approximately $16,000.00 to <br />$20,000.00. At the last meeting I gave you a letter from an <br />appraiser that said the maximum benefit we would receive from the <br />sewer would $3,000.00 to $5,000.00. I question the logic of <br />including us in the project. We would provide a deed restriction <br />• to you to insure that our alternate sites would remain as such." <br />Bernhardson commented that the City would question whether <br />septic systems that were put in prior to 1978 meet the standards. <br />That is why we are requiring two sites for those properties. <br />Bernhardson stated the the person that determined the <br />Whitmans have three alternate sites is a contractor, not a <br />qualified site evaluator. The contractor used setbacks for <br />determining the number of sites, but did not perform soil tests. <br />Ms. Whitman stated that she had talked with Gaffron and he <br />had told her that soil tests were not necessary at this point. <br />Ms. Whitman said, "Mike informed me that he has walked our <br />property and also believes that there are three alternate sites. <br />If you require us to do soil testing we will do that." <br />Bernhardson suggested that the Whitmans not proceed with <br />soil testing until it is determined whether or not they will be <br />excluded. <br />Mayor Grabek asked why it would cost the Whitmans $16,000.00 <br />for sewer. <br />Cook replied, "In addition to the $6,500.00 cost for the <br />• trunk, there is a lateral fee to get the sewer to their lot. In <br />14 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.