Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 24, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 6 of 21 <br /> <br />(7. #14-3691 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LAKEVIEW PROPERTY, 405 NORTH ARM DRIVE – <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH PRD OVERLAY, continued) <br /> <br />Mattick stated he can tell the Council that from a Staff level it is not uncommon to be dealing with <br />encroachments in the conservation easements. The Council needs to be aware that if the homeowners <br />association does not reserve adequate money for those three items, there will be problems. The City’s <br />conservation easement is very restrictive with what is allowed and that the City is asking the homeowners <br />association to deal with those issues. Mattick stated you typically do not see those issues for the first <br />generation of homeowners, but that in the years after that, it will amount to tens or hundreds of thousands <br />of dollars to fix the road. Mattick stated homeowners associations can sometimes become dysfunctional <br />and that it is a different situation when neighbors are monitoring these things rather than a governmental <br />agency. <br /> <br />Mattick stated Staff will attempt to craft the necessary language in the documents to deal with those types <br />of situations but that he wanted to make sure it is a very conscious decision on the part of the City <br />Council and developer going forward. <br /> <br />Hiller stated on the draft resolution for the preliminary plat approval there are a couple of fees mentioned. <br />Hiller stated he was expecting the park dedication fee but that he had no idea the stormwater trunk fee <br />would be as large as it is. Hiller stated that item was not included in their budget and they have not been <br />planning for it. <br /> <br />Hiller indicated he would like to discuss that further. Hiller stated Staff has provided him with the <br />original language from 2002 and the theory behind it and what the reasoning was for applying it on a per <br />acre basis. The basic idea behind the per-acre fee was to create infrastructure to move the stormwater <br />through the City. <br /> <br />Hiller stated to his understanding the other developments that have gone through this process prior to this <br />development have paid the fee. Hiller stated he would ask the City Council to consider all the restoration <br />to the site that they are doing. Hiller noted this site is not the typical site that has been developed in the <br />City previously and that massive amounts of restoration are required. Hiller noted the City has given <br />them some relief on the trees, but that cleanup of the greens from the fungicide is also very expensive. <br />Lab testing has already begun on soil samples. Hiller noted on the Red Oak Golf Course project, they <br />spent $260,000 on a 9-hole golf course that consisted of 21-acres. <br /> <br />Hiller noted the stormwater fee is approximately $545,000. Hiller stated they will need to spend more <br />than that to clean up the site. Hiller stated those two extraordinary costs will approach a million dollars <br />before anything else is done to the site and that he is asking the Council for some flexibility on the fee by <br />either waiving the fee or reducing it by a significant amount. <br /> <br />Hiller stated in the last few years the City has collected $235,000 of stormwater trunk fees, which is an <br />average of $78,000 of trunk fees for the entire City. At $545,000, that would be seven years’ worth of <br />fees that would be applied to this site. Hiller stated the magnitude of the number is a lot and that he <br />realizes this is a new item but that he did not catch it earlier. Hiller stated otherwise he is fine with the <br />document as written. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the City has given stormwater credit for conservation areas in the past.