My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-2014 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
11-24-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2019 4:01:45 PM
Creation date
4/19/2019 4:01:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 24, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 5 of 21 <br /> <br />(7. #14-3691 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LAKEVIEW PROPERTY, 405 NORTH ARM DRIVE – <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH PRD OVERLAY, continued) <br /> <br />the other item from the last meeting focused on the trees, especially evergreens, and that he had asked the <br />Council whether they could look at possibly removing some of the junipers and Black Hills spruce on the <br />site. Simenson indicated a number of them are starting to decline in health and that they are spaced all <br />over the site. Simenson stated those type of trees tend to be a problem for a prairie because they are <br />difficult to manage and junipers are prolific seeders. Simenson stated he would like to reduce the number <br />of junipers to help with management costs going into the future. <br /> <br />Simenson indicated he visited the site approximately one week ago and went through all the areas. <br />Simenson stated one of the questions centers on the fact that he is proposing to take out a number of <br />Black Hills spruce trees and red cedars in certain areas but not from the entire site. Simenson indicated he <br />is attempting to be conscious of retaining some screening and that it would also be impossible to <br />eliminate all the different trees in the neighborhood. Simenson stated he has attempted to condense some <br />of the areas of the Black Hills spruce and the junipers. <br /> <br />Simenson noted on the west side of the parcel, there is a large number of Colorado blue spruce and the <br />majority of those are not proposed to be removed since they do provide some screening. Simenson stated <br />removal of some of the evergreens will help keep the costs down and allows the prairie to thrive better. <br /> <br />Simenson stated he marked 132 trees, which added a little over a 1,000 inches of tree removal. Simenson <br />stated even if the additional removal of trees, there will still be a tremendous amount of trees on the site <br />but the tree removal will help the prairie immensely. <br /> <br />Hiller stated Staff’s report focuses on basically five bullet points. The first bullet point deals with the <br />trails and their request is to create a connectively from the neighborhood into the park. Hiller stated there <br />would be an easement over some of the private lots that the homeowners association would maintain. <br />Hiller stated the trails would create an easy walking path for everyone. The plan will continue to be that <br />the homeowners association will be in charge of the ongoing maintenance of the prairie areas, the private <br />road system, and the walking trails. The association dues will need to be sufficient to address all of those <br />needs. Hiller stated his role as a developer is to set everything up properly and that he is not sure how to <br />respond to the questions about the future relating to that. <br /> <br />Mattick stated Staff and the Council have discussed the pros and cons of private roads in the past and that <br />the decision was made that this development would have a private road with the various cul-de-sacs. <br />There was also a question about the trails discussed with the Council. The trails will be privately owned <br />and maintained but open to the public, which is a nice amenity. The conservation easements will also be <br />under the control of the homeowners association. Mattick stated the proposal is nice in theory on all three <br />parts. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the issue is to make sure the City Council is aware that when the trails are created and the <br />public begins to use them, because they are open to the public, that when there are problems or <br />maintenance issues, that will be a homeowners association issue to deal with. In addition, when the road <br />starts to show wear and needs to be replaced, that will be the homeowners association. Policing the <br />conservation easements will also be the responsibility of the homeowners association.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.