Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, March 11, 2019 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Crosby stated he is saying they should get rid of the fifth section and the half section. <br /> Walsh stated what he has heard is that if the line is in the middle as depicted on the drawing, that one does <br /> not count, and he can have three full sections past the cattails. <br /> Johnson stated they will have to rely on the applicant to construct it to the right length. Originally a <br /> bunch of cattails were ripped out and a dock put in, and if they wanted to extend the dock, all they would <br /> have to do is remove cattails. <br /> Walsh pointed out removing the cattails would actually make it worse for them. <br /> Crosby suggested they leave it at four complete sections from the cattails. <br /> Mattick stated his understanding is that dock sections come in different lengths and that the City Council <br /> may actually want to clarify the length. <br /> Crosby recommended the dock be basically 32 feet from the cattails. <br /> Johnson moved,Crosby seconded,Application No.LA19-000003,Fine Line Docks on behalf of <br /> Thomas and Kelsey Hamilton, 1795 Fox Street,to approve a conditional use permit for a dock not <br /> to exceed 32 feet from the edge of the cattails. <br /> Printup stated he would like clarification on where the edge of the cattails is. <br /> Mattick stated in essence the applicants are asking for a 190-foot dock and that the Council has shrunk it <br /> by approximately eight feet. Mattick stated he is assuming they start the dock at the shoreline and that it <br /> might be better to clarify the length of the dock. <br /> Johnson stated he is most comfortable keeping it as an extension out from the cattails because the <br /> homeowner might decide,when laying out the dock, that he wants to have an extra section on the land for <br /> better egress. If the dock goes out 32 feet from the cattails, that will achieve what he would like to see for <br /> the length of the dock and that the homeowner can always come back and ask for it to be extended. <br /> Mattick asked whether the motion includes a requirement for reflectors to be installed. <br /> Johnson amended his motion to include the installation of reflectors. Crosby seconded. <br /> Printup noted this is a CUP and that it runs with the property. In the future,if there is motorized <br /> watercraft or jet skis, there is nothing the City can do. <br /> Seals stated there is nothing the City can do to prevent jet skis in the area. <br /> Printup noted there are other docks along the creek,which makes him somewhat supportive of it. <br /> Hamilton indicated there are at least three other docks. <br /> Johnson stated the other docks come out to the edge of the cattails and then go perpendicular to the <br /> cattails. <br /> Page 8 of 16 <br />