My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-11-2019 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
03-11-2019 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2019 10:45:21 AM
Creation date
4/10/2019 10:45:19 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, March 11, 2019 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Jessie Johnson stated there was not a house on the property and that they installed the dock accidentally <br /> so it had to be taken out. <br /> Hamilton stated they were told they need to get approval from the DNR and the Watershed District and <br /> that it was not necessary to ask the City for approval. <br /> Crosby stated if it is a safety issue due to the snowmobilers, they can illuminate the dock, and if it needs <br /> to be farther out to accommodate the boat,he can understand that. <br /> Hamilton stated the proposed end of the dock would be approximately where the two points come out and <br /> that it would not be out in the middle of the channel by any means. <br /> Barnhart noted on the last permanent dock the City approved on Shadywood, Staff required reflectors <br /> every four feet,and that he would recommend the same condition here. <br /> Walsh commented he is not sure he would like the dock illuminated all night long and that the reflectors <br /> might be a good option. <br /> Hamilton indicated that is not a problem. <br /> Printup stated even though he has not seen anything motorized go up and down in that area,he is <br /> concerned about the motorized vehicles. Printup stated his first reaction was that it was going out an <br /> awful long way but that the applicant has gone through the proper channels and got the approvals. <br /> Printup stated he does not want to see docks on creeks. The reflectors are fine but that it comes down to <br /> the length. <br /> Walsh stated he worries if the boat is only 12 feet from the cattails, how that might not be sufficient, and <br /> that a compromise might be to remove only one section. <br /> Seals commented she has been struggling with this application and that in her view the property owner <br /> does have a right to a dock but that she has seen snowmobilers hit things. Seals stated she leans towards <br /> reducing how far out the dock extends. <br /> Walsh stated if it is not working, the property owner can come back before the City Council. <br /> Johnson stated if there was a huge difference in water depth, that would be one thing, but going further <br /> out is not achieving anything. A dock that far out would be intrusive to that area and that he does not see <br /> a good reason to not shorten it. <br /> Johnson moved to approve the conditional use permit fora dock not to exceed three sections or24 <br /> feet from the edge of the cattails. <br /> Walsh asked if he means three sections past the cattails. <br /> Crosby stated if the sections are eight feet,he would propose four sections from the cattails. <br /> Johnson withdrew his motion. <br /> Page 7 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.