Laserfiche WebLink
PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM <br /> LA19-000010 <br /> 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the <br /> Zoning Chapter. <br /> Response: The homeowner requests the rebuilding of an existing dilapidated detached garage. The existing garage <br /> is located within the allowed side yard setback at a distance of 2.5? from the property line, per zoning code the <br /> existing side yard setback is 10?-0?. The existing garage has a footprint of 440.36 s.f. (20.2? x 21.8?). The <br /> proposed garage has a footprint of 744 s.f. (31? x 24?). The back wall (SE) of the proposed garage would align with <br /> existing garage, thus located 2.5? from the property line. In addition to the request for side yard setback, the <br /> applicant is seeking a CUP to locate a shower in the studio space of the detached garage. The primary structure on <br /> the site is a charming 900 s.f. cottage built in 1900. The homeowners wish to maintain the charm and scale of the <br /> original cottage, and thus rather than add onto the cottage they propose to add much needed ancillary space above <br /> the garage. In addition to parking for two cars and modest storage, the proposed detached garage has conditioned <br /> space above the parking to allow for additional flexible space for the family to use as home office and exercise <br /> spaces. The primary structure has only one full bathroom, the additional full baths provide extra room for the family <br /> to clean up after a day on the lake. <br /> 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the <br /> landowner. <br /> Response: Due to the topography of the site and original cottage siting, a detached garage is sensible. The parcel <br /> contains a pond in the front yard, rendering the front half of the lot unbuildable. An ingress and egress easement <br /> with adjacent neighbor prohibit building on a good portion of the lot. This easement was agreed upon by the former <br /> property owner and is maintained with proposed garage location. The proposed garage location provides additional <br /> driveway beyond the easement boundary, necessary to maintain statutes of travel easement. Additionally, the <br /> location of the proposed garage maintains connectivity to front of lot and does not block the view of the quaint lake <br /> cottage. <br /> 3. The variance, if granted,will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br /> Response: If granted the variance will enhance the character of the locality. The proposed garage complements <br /> the cottage, but does not outshine it. The garage location does not block the view of the cottage and replaces a <br /> derelict garage that is unsafe and an eyesore. The footprint of the garage is purposefully compact at 744 s.f., as to <br /> not overscale the primary cottage structure. <br /> 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the <br /> property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. <br /> Response: The homeowners are committed to maintaining the original turn of the century cottage, a housing stock <br /> that is often sacrificed due to high lake property values. The homeowner chooses to invest in the integrity of the <br /> property rather than tear down the cottage and build new. <br /> 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar <br /> energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota <br /> Statutes, Section 116].06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. <br /> Response: The practical difficulties of the site are the topography, the travel easement, the front yard pond, and <br /> the desire to maintain primary cottage. The proposed garage location occupies the location of the existing garage <br /> and provides much needed additional space for parking cars, storage, and secondary conditioned space. <br /> 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is <br /> not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. <br /> Response: All proposed uses are allowed under the LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential zone in which the <br /> property is located. <br />