My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-22-2019 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2019
>
01-22-2019 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2019 10:58:43 AM
Creation date
1/23/2019 10:58:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE#LA 18-000095 <br /> January 22,2019 <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> 4,to Long Lake Lake. This creek is considered a tributary, and the 75 lake yard applies. Lots 2— <br /> 4 retain adequate buildable area,though a driveway to serve Lot 3 will need to go through this <br /> setback area, and over the creek. The watershed district may have some comment on this <br /> proposal. <br /> A Conservation Design Plan will be required for this development per Section 82-300, and with it <br /> the wetland delineations will be confirmed. <br /> This project will trigger stormwater management rules. The applicant has been advised to visit <br /> with the watershed district early in the subdivision design process. <br /> Docks for lake lots 4, 5, and 6 may encroach into a wetland;these docks are limited to 8 feet in <br /> width. <br /> Public Comments <br /> The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on January 10th. Staff was not in attendance, but the <br /> applicant reported that about 9 neighboring residents were at the meeting and the concept was <br /> generally well received. <br /> Staff has received one comment letter. Though the letter incorrectly references a January 10, <br /> 2019 Council meeting, their comments are based on potential impacts to the wetland and creek; <br /> these issues we are looking for feedback from the watershed district on. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission have an opinion on the lot width issues identified for Lots <br /> 3 and 6? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission support some flexibility to the Average Lake Shore Setback <br /> for lots 4 and 5? <br /> 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> Exhibit A. Application <br /> Exhibit B. Proposed Plan <br /> Exhibit C. Applicants Narrative <br /> Exhibit D. Neighbor Comment Letter <br /> Exhibit E. Location Map <br /> Exhibit F. Aerial Photo <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.