My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/18/2014 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
08/18/2014 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 11:51:04 AM
Creation date
12/21/2018 11:50:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,August 18,2014 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Lemke stated he also is in agreement that it would be an improvement to the site. <br /> Landgraver moved,Thiesse seconded,Application No. 14-3663,Lauren Patnode,3596 Shoreline <br /> Drive,to recommend approval of the proposed site plan,granting of the five variances and two <br /> conditional use permits as outlined in Staff's report,subject to all conditions listed in Staffs <br /> memorandum dated August 18,2014; to limit parking by all delivery vehicles to the back parking <br /> lot; and subject to the condition that the storage area of the building shall be related to the office <br /> and service use. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. <br /> 6. #14-3675 RYAN AND STACY ALNESS,XXX ELMWOOD AVENUE/PID 07-117-23-11- <br /> 0027,VARIANCES,7:26 P.M.—8:03 P.M. <br /> Ryan and Stacy Alness, Applicants, were present. <br /> Gaffron noted the applicants have formally withdrawn their variance to height request. The applicants <br /> initially were proposing to have a three-story house but have been redesigning their house plans to meet <br /> the 2-1/2 story limit following the July Planning Commission meeting. The applicants are still requesting <br /> an average lakeshore setback variance. <br /> Gaffron displayed the site plan on the overhead. Gaffron pointed out the two houses that set the average <br /> setback line for the subject property, noting the line goes through the middle of the proposed structure. <br /> Gaffron stated the buildable area of the site, after you take into account the 10-foot side setbacks and the <br /> 30-foot street setback, leaves approximately a 600- foot buildable area, which is not large enough for a <br /> reasonable sized house. The lot is functionally not buildable for a typical residence without an average <br /> setback variance. <br /> The intent of the average setback ordinance is primarily to protect the lake views a lakeshore property <br /> owner enjoys over their neighbor's lakeshore yard and avoid the"tunnel view"effect of being set back <br /> further from the lake than one's neighbors. In the current situation, lake views enjoyed by the owners of <br /> the neighboring residence to the north at 1135 North Arm Drive are potentially affected by the proposed <br /> location of the applicants' home. The house at 1135 is slightly skewed on its lot, and its existing views of <br /> the lake are slightly angled across the applicants' property. The house at 1135 is set back from the lake a <br /> significantly greater distance than most other lakeshore homes in the immediate neighborhood. <br /> Gaffron stated an additional factor for consideration is that the house at 1135 sits substantially higher in <br /> the topography than the applicants' proposed house. The existing patio-level grade at the lake side of <br /> 1135 based on the 1997 survey is approximately 978.5 feet and the deck floor above it is approximately <br /> 987.9 feet. The applicants' revised roof peak is at approximately 982 feet. Gaffron stated someone <br /> sitting on the deck of the neighbor's house would likely have views over the top of the house, and if <br /> someone is sitting at the neighbor's patio, they may be looking across the top of the house. <br /> Gaffron stated the applicants have revised their plans to lower the house two feet into the ground. The <br /> wing that would house the garage has not been changed except for lowering the peak by two feet. <br /> The Planning Commission is being asked to consider whether one or more of the above factors, or other <br /> factors, establish a practical difficulty that justifies granting an average setback variance. Staff would <br /> request that the Planning Commission take action tonight either approving or denying the application. <br /> The application would then go before the City Council at their September 8 meeting. <br /> Page 11 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.