My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/18/2014 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
08/18/2014 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 11:51:04 AM
Creation date
12/21/2018 11:50:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,August 18,2014 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 7:17 p.m. <br /> Leskinen stated she is in agreement with Commissioner Thiesse and that the hours of delivery should be <br /> specified in the conditions of the conditional use permit. <br /> Thiesse asked if the City can prevent parking on a Hennepin County roadway. <br /> Mack stated he would need to look into that. <br /> Thiesse commented no parking in that area would be difficult to enforce and that he is not sure including <br /> that restriction in the conditional use permit would help. <br /> Mack stated it sounds like the applicant does not have any objection to imposing a time restriction on the <br /> deliveries. <br /> Leskinen stated the proposal is an improvement over what currently exists but that she has some concerns <br /> regarding access. Leskinen stated she is assuming those will be reviewed by the building inspector and <br /> fire marshal prior to a building permit being issued. <br /> Thiesse stated in his view it is a wonderful improvement to the property and that it is unfortunate there is <br /> a nearby resident who is opposed to the project. Thiesse noted that resident is not an adjoining property <br /> owner. Thiesse stated the more he thinks about it,there should be a restriction on deliveries included in <br /> the conditional use permit. <br /> Leskinen stated specifying where the deliveries can happen would be more restrictive than specifying <br /> what time the deliveries can happen. <br /> Landgraver and McGrann indicated they are in agreement with restricting parking by delivery vehicles to <br /> the back of the building. <br /> Leskinen noted the Planning Commission has previously discussed the other uses in the building. <br /> Thiesse asked if Blaine is a city street. <br /> Mack indicated it is. <br /> Thiesse asked if the City has requirements for curb cuts. <br /> Mack stated the City does and that the contractor would be responsible for obtaining the appropriate <br /> permission for a curb cut from Hennepin County and the City. <br /> Lemke asked when they plan to occupy the building. <br /> Reiners stated to his understanding they plan to occupy within 12 months. <br /> Landgraver stated landscaping is important for the neighbors and that he concurs with Staffs thoughts on <br /> that. Landgraver indicated he also is not opposed to the slight increase in hardcover. <br /> Page 10 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.