My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/16/2014 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2014
>
06/16/2014 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 11:43:27 AM
Creation date
12/21/2018 11:43:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,June 16,2014 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Landgraver moved,Thiesse seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 14-3673,Justin <br /> McCoy on behalf of Orono Public School ISD 278,685,765,795,and 800 Old Crystal Bay Road <br /> North,granting of a sign variance and a conditional use permit to install four signs according to the <br /> submitted sign plan. <br /> Schoenzeit suggested the motion be amended to make the recommendation that the City of Orono refund <br /> the application fee given the mission and resources of the institution. <br /> Landgraver amended his motion,Thiesse seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 14- <br /> 3673,Justin McCoy on behalf of Orono Public School ISD 278,685, 765,795,and 800 Old Crystal <br /> Bay Road North,granting of a sign variance and a conditional use permit to install four signs <br /> according to the submitted sign plan,with the recommendation that the City of Orono waive the <br /> application fee. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. <br /> 5. #14-3674 LORI GHERARDI ON BEHALF OF WOLVERTON PLACE, LLC,4570 <br /> WOLVERTON PLACE,VACATION OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT,7:55 P.M.—8:15 P.M. <br /> Lori Gherardi, Applicant,was present. <br /> Curtis stated in 2012, the City approved a subdivision which divided the then 10-acre parcel into two <br /> five-acre parcels. The initial parcel was addressed 4550 Wolverton Place, which had an existing home, <br /> and the other parcel is still vacant and is addressed 4750. The lot addressed 4750 is the subject of this <br /> application. <br /> In April of 2013, in conjunction with the recording of this 2012-approved subdivision,the City received a <br /> Permanent Tree Stand and Native Grassland Preservation and Conservation Easement. This easement <br /> was recommended by the applicant's environmental consultant as a result of the Conservation Design <br /> process, agreed to by the applicant at the time of subdivision, and accepted by the City in good faith. This <br /> easement was subsequently recorded over the 10—plus acre parcel prior to the recording of the <br /> subdivision. <br /> The grassland south portion of the easement exists over most of the current property at 4750 Wolverton <br /> Place. It consists primarily of grass and appears as a yard area. There is no specific, active public use of <br /> the property burdened by the grassland south easement area. Rather, its value to the public is as a runoff <br /> filtration and absorption area, such that the reduced volume of runoff water leaving the site is of a higher <br /> quality than if it ran off a maintained lawn area. In addition,the easement contains a variety of <br /> restrictions attempting to preserve the environmental and visual values of the site. <br /> In April of 2014,the new owners of the new easterly lot, 4550 Wolverton Place, questioned the purpose <br /> and viability of the easement, but more specifically claimed they had not been provided proper <br /> notification of the easement's existence when they closed on the property. In order to avoid threatened <br /> litigation, the City Council ultimately granted a vacation of the portion of the easement over 4550 <br /> Wolverton Place. The applicant is now requesting similar consideration of an easement vacation for <br /> the property at 4750. <br /> As outlined in Staffs memo, it is noted that the applicant received a monetary benefit as a result of the <br /> initial granting of the conservation easement with the subdivision. It is the opinion of Staff that it would <br /> Page 14 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.