My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/16/2014 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2014
>
06/16/2014 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 11:43:27 AM
Creation date
12/21/2018 11:43:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,June 16,2014 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> McCoy indicated the signs will not be lit. <br /> McGrann asked if the signs are necessary because people are having difficulty finding the correct school. <br /> McCoy stated the signs are intended to help visitors locate the correct campus. <br /> Leskinen asked if there is a particular reason for going with the blue sign rather than the brick and stucco. <br /> McCoy stated the biggest issue was the cost and that brick and stucco would require footings. McCoy <br /> stated the school's long-range plan is to construct a brick and stucco monument sign on the north end at <br /> some point. McCoy indicated these signs are more directional signs once a person accesses the campus <br /> from either end. <br /> Leskinen asked if the signs will be constructed out of metal. <br /> McCoy indicated they will be constructed out of aluminum. <br /> Thiesse asked if the signs will extend down to the grade. <br /> McCoy indicated they will. <br /> Schoenzeit asked if the school district paid an application fee. <br /> McCoy stated they will need to pay the fee. <br /> Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 7:52 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 7:52 p.m. <br /> Leskinen stated she has no huge problems with the application given the uniqueness of the school district <br /> and the fact that there are no residences in the immediate area. Leskinen stated she understands the desire <br /> not to construct the signs out of brick. <br /> Landgraver stated in his view the signs will be an improvement and will assist visitors to the school <br /> campus. <br /> McGrann indicated he is in agreement with Commissioner Landgraver. <br /> Thiesse stated if the sign is going to be run all the way to the ground with only a frost footing in the <br /> middle of the sign, there will be problems with the signs heaving. Thiesse stated he would recommend <br /> either raising the sign or putting a frost footing under the entire sign. <br /> Landgraver asked if Commissioner Thiesse is requesting that be made part of the motion. <br /> Thiesse indicated he is not. <br /> Page 13 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.