Laserfiche WebLink
04111/2002 23:24 9529300043 LASZLO FULOP PAGE 11r'21 <br /> APPENDLX S <br /> CONTRACT AINARD <br /> GOOD-�AITH EF�ORTS CtiU1DELINES <br /> Information referenced below-�shall be submitted to the county as required to assist th� county in .- <br /> ev�luating good-faith efforts. Verification of good-faith efforts shall include a specific response to <br /> each of the following applicable categories. A bidder may include any additiona! informativn the <br /> bidder believes may be relevant. <br /> 1. Verification tha#the bidder rejected SeE',s because they did not submit the lowest bid or they <br /> were not quaiifed. Such verification shall include a verified sta#ement of the amounts of all <br /> bids received from potential subcon#ractors on the project and that the bidder rejecEed SBE's <br /> because they did not submit the lowest bid from amortg such bids or they were not qualified. <br /> For each S�E found to be not qual'rfied, the verification shall iriclude a statement giving the <br /> bidder's reasons for its conclusion. <br /> 2. Verification of efforts to contract by timely written or telephone notice to all appropriate SBE's <br /> within identified subcontracting categories listed in the most current, approved certification <br /> Directory. !f bidders have purchased pr�ject plans seven (7) calsndar days ar fewer before <br /> bids are due, dvcumented phone calfs in lieu of written notice may be permitted. <br /> 3. Verification of efForts tQ subcontract, consistent with industry practice, with the SBE's whom <br /> the bidder has contaCted, or who have contacted the bidder. Include the names, addresses, <br /> and telephone numbets of all SBE's contacted; a description ofi efforts made to subcontract; <br /> and a description af the information provided to the SBE regarding the plans and <br /> specifications for the portion of the work to bs perFormed by subcontractors. If attempts to <br /> subcontract actually occurred, provide the dates and places of such process and a <br /> description of the outcome. <br /> 4. Verification that the bidder attempted to recruit S�E's from at Ieast the same geographic area <br /> from which it attempted to recruit other subcontractors. <br /> 5. Verification that, consistent with industry practice, the bidder gave SBE's necessary access <br /> to and adequate time to review all necessary project plans, drawings, specifications and <br /> other documents, as well as adequate time to prepare subconUact bids. <br /> 6. Verification that, consistent with industry practice, th�'�bidder's past practices on similar <br /> projects, the bidder selected portions of the work to be pertarmed by SBE's in order io <br /> achieve the project utilization levels. This Includes considerativn of structuring the contract <br /> into economically feasible units to facilitate meaningful SBE utilization as subcontractors or <br /> suppliers. <br /> 7. Statement giving the reasons why the bidder and each SB� contacted or each SBE that <br /> contacted the bidder did not succeed in reaching a subcontracting agreement. <br /> 8. Statement that the bidder attended pre-bid meetings or otherwise obtained the information <br /> on subcontracting opportuni#ies that is provided at such meetings. <br /> . ... . . .. .. <br /> L. Rev.3/18/02 <br /> p,4 af 5 <br />