Laserfiche WebLink
� ; � S �� <br /> o� �- <br /> � � � CITY QF OR O <br /> RESOLUT'ION OF THE CITY COUNCI�� <br /> � � � � � � <br /> �� � <br /> G NO. <br /> t'�kEsxo��' <br /> � � <br /> A RESOLUTION <br /> AMENDING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF <br /> RES4LUTION NO. 6581 FUR <br /> PRUPERTY LOCATED AT 2024 SHADYWOQD ROAD <br /> —FILE NO. 15-3792. <br /> WHEREAS,Resolution No. 6581 adopted by the City Council on February 8,20l b <br /> grante+d hardcover and setback variances for canstruction of a detached garage on the property <br /> located at 2024 Shadywood Road within the Cit��of Orono av��ned by John F. Kieffer and Benjamin <br /> E. Kaef�'er,married, (hereinafier ihe"Applicants")and legally described as follows: <br /> Lat 4, Gust S. Johnson's Addition, Hennepin County , Minnesota and Part of Lot 5, Gust <br /> S. Johnson's Addition described as follc�v►�s: Commencing at a point on the Norih line of <br /> Lot 5, said point t�ein� i Ol.1 feet Westerl}� of the Northeast comer of said Lot 5; thence <br /> Westerly along the Northerly line of said Lot 5 a distance of 129.9 feet to the Northwest <br /> corner of said Lot 5, according ta the swvey and stake set b}r Surveyor C.F. Sandhoff an <br /> No��ember 5, 193b; thence Southerly alang the Westerly line a distance of 1.8 feet to an <br /> iron pipe set in concrete; thence F.asterly a distance of 129.9 f�eet to the point of <br /> beginning, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Hennepin Count��Pl]tiS 17-117-23 31 OOl l) <br /> (hereinafler the "pmperty"); and <br /> WHEREAS, Resolution No. 6581 was adopted based on a specific gazage design <br /> and orientation depicted in Exhibit C to said Resolution. The roaf line af the appraved garage <br /> design was oriented to direct drainage io the east and west of the garage, i.e. toward the front ar <br /> rear and not to the side; an�d <br /> WHEREAS, tl�e applicants ha��e requested a re�rision to the garage design that <br /> would d'uect drainage toward the south side lot line lvcated only 5 feet fram the garage and with <br /> overhangs approximately 3.5 feet from the side lot line, which drainage if noi redirected could <br /> ha��e impacts to the neighboring property; and <br /> Vti'HEREAS, if the reorieniation of the roof line is apprt�ti�ed the applicants have <br /> agreed to install rain �utters aiong the south roof line to redirect raQi'runoff to the front and rear <br /> to eliminate the potential direct runoff impacts lo the neighboring propert5j. <br /> Page 1 of 3 <br />