My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-01462 - new structure
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
S
>
Sandstone Lane
>
2496 Sandstone Lane - 33-118-23-11-0023
>
Permits/Inspections
>
2014-01462 - new structure
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:43:06 PM
Creation date
8/20/2018 3:10:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2496
Street Name
Sandstone
Street Type
Lane
Address
2496 Sandstone Lane
Document Type
Permits/Inspections
PIN
3311823110023
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br /> Mike Gaffron <br /> From: Mike Gaffron <br /> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 4:29 PM <br /> To: 'steveo@wooddalebuilders.com' <br /> Cc: Lyle Oman; Christine Mattson <br /> Subject: 2496-2498 Sandstone Lane-Stonebay <br /> Steve— <br /> I am finding some of the same issues with the proposed plans for these two units as were found on the ones up the <br /> street you built last summer <br /> Although the survey doesn't show the 35' MCWD wetland buffer boundary, I scaled it off from the plat and concluded <br /> that will not be an issue with these units. <br /> However, the plans show the total length of the house on Lot 19 (left unit) including the roofed screen porch (but not its <br /> overhang) at 84 feet. The lot is only 80' long. Based on this, the proposed screen porch extends 4' past the rear lot line, <br /> while the survey indicates only a 2-foot encroachment over the line. The survey and plans don't match. Either way, this <br /> magnitude of encroachment is not allowed.The same issue, but to a lesser magnitude, is also apparent in the right hand <br /> unit, Lot 20,which on the plans is dimensioned at 82'within an 80' deep lot. <br /> The allowed encroachments of commons area do not allow for this magnitude of new construction encroaching into the <br /> commons area by design, only in error. The only allowed encroachments by design are: <br /> 1) a roof overhang encroachment of 36 inches; <br /> 2) a box window encroachment of 18 inches; and <br /> 3) a deck overhang encroachment of 30 inches <br /> The proposed screen porches are not decks. We have denied covered porch encroachments in the commons area in <br /> Stonebay in the past, including the units you built last summer. <br /> It would appear the simple solution to this is to reduce the depth of the screen porches so that no portions of their walls <br /> extend past the rear lot line. Other solutions would include decreasing the overall length of the units so that there is no <br /> overlap of porch structure. The porch roof is allowed to encroach as much as 36' past the rear lot line, but not the porch <br /> itself. <br /> Please call or email if you have questions. We will need revised sets of plans for each unit and a revised survey in order <br /> to continue our review. <br /> Mike <br /> Michael P.Gaffron <br /> Senior Planner <br /> City of Orono <br /> (Street Address)2750 Kelley Parkway <br /> (Mailing Address)P.O. Box 66,Crystal Bay,MN 55323 <br /> Phone:(952)249-4622 <br /> Fax: (952)249-4616 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.