My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#6768-variance-2017
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
R
>
Rest Point Lane
>
1325 Rest Point Lane - 07-117-23-32-0053
>
Resolutions
>
#6768-variance-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:35:43 PM
Creation date
7/16/2018 11:46:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1325
Street Name
Rest Point
Street Type
Lane
Address
1325 Rest Point La
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
0711723320053
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, <br /> ���p CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> y�, G�� No. � 7 6 8 <br /> ��kESH��� <br /> mendoned meetings, and any and all other materials disiributed at these meetings are <br /> hereby incorporated by reference. <br /> 2. The Property is located in the LR-1B Zoning District. <br /> 3. The Property contains 0.35 acres in area(1 acre is required) and has a defined lot width of <br /> 75 feet{140 feet is required). <br /> 4. The Property is within Tier 2 and hardcover is limited to 30%according to the Stormwater <br /> QuaIity Overlay District. <br /> 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: � <br /> a. Lot Area(15,590 square feet were 43,560 square feet is required) <br /> b. Lot Width(75 feet where 140 feet is required) <br /> c. Side street setback(29 feet where 35 feet is required) <br /> 6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and <br /> recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon <br /> the health,safety and welfare of the community,existing and anticipated traffic conditions, <br /> light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property <br /> in the sutrounding area. <br /> ANALYSIS: <br /> The following analysis was conducted: <br /> 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The <br /> proposed use is consis�,`ent with the zoning ordinance, the proposed encroachment <br /> appears to be the mtn�imum necessary. <br /> 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.The property is guided for singte <br /> family residentYal. <br /> 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br /> a. The property ov�er proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not <br /> peimitted by the lofficial controls; The applicant 6as developed a 6ome that <br /> meets wlth the constraints as much As practicable. Fully meeting the <br /> requirements fo�the ordinance would only permit a 30 foot wide home. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.