Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,November 20,2017 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> ROLL CALL <br /> The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: <br /> Chair John Thiesse, Commissioners Kevin Landgraver,Bruce Lemke, Chad Olson, and Loren <br /> Schoenzeit. Representing Staff were Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart, City Planners <br /> Melanie Curtis and Laura Oakden, and Recorder Jackie Young. <br /> Chair Thiesse called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. <br /> 1. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF <br /> OCTOBER 16,2017 <br /> Landgraver moved,Lemke seconded,to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission <br /> meeting of October 16,2017,as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> 2. #17-3979 KIMBERLY AND STEVE SCHOTTLER,2740 SHADYWOOD ROAD,AFTER- <br /> THE-FACT VARIANCES, 6:35 P.M.—7:05 P.M. <br /> Steve Schottler,Applicant, was present. <br /> Curtis stated the applicants purchased the property in August of 2016. In September of 2016,the City <br /> issued a stop work notice for unpermitted construction of a new screen porch on the lake side of the <br /> home. A follow-up inspection in July of 2017 showed that the porch had not been removed and no permit <br /> or variance applications had been submitted. <br /> The applicants have now submitted a variance application in October. The screen porch was constructed <br /> in the place of a smaller 26-foot wide second-story deck which extended 11 feet from the house toward <br /> the lake. An 11.6' x 11.6' deck was built where that portion of the existing deck was located on the <br /> southeast side of the residence. Next to that a new 25.6' x 31.5' roofed screen porch now extends 31.5 <br /> feet toward the lake,which is 20 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line and approximately <br /> two feet into the 75-foot setback. <br /> Staff finds no practical difficulties supporting hardcover and structural encroachments into the 75-foot <br /> setback. In addition,the screen porch could be redesigned to provide for that same outdoor living space <br /> within the permitted setback areas. Although the project is supported by the neighbors, Staff does not <br /> identify sufficient practical difficulties supporting the substantial average lakeshore setback <br /> encroachment. <br /> If the Planning Commission identifies practical difficulties support the new screen porch encroachment <br /> lakeward of the average lakeshore setback, a motion for approval would be appropriate. If the Planning <br /> Commission recommends approval,the comments from the building official should be taken into <br /> consideration. <br /> Staff recommends denial of the 75-foot setback and hardcover encroachment since neither are supported <br /> by practical difficulties. <br /> Curtis displayed photographs of the screen porch and yard. <br /> Page 1 of 21 <br />