Laserfiche WebLink
� � °� <br /> 0 0 <br /> j���aa-:- C ITY of OI�ONO <br /> � � .,�:,� � <br /> bt .... � <br /> � � � '�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �L`4kEsH.�4�G NO. � � � � <br /> A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES <br /> TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTIONS 78-1112, 78-1288 (A); <br /> GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br /> PER SECTIONS 78-966 AND 78-1250; <br /> AND DENYING A VARTANCE TO <br /> SECTIONS 78-281, 78-1288, 78-1281, AND 78-1432 <br /> FILE NO. 04-3002 <br /> WHEREAS, G & L Land Investment LLC, a Minnesota liinited liability <br /> corporation (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 740 North <br /> ��Il Drive within the Ciiy of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and le�ally described as <br /> follows: <br /> Lot 4, Auditors Subdivision 362, Hennepin County, Minnesota <br /> (hereinafter the "property"); and <br /> WHEREAS, the applicant made application to the City of Orono for <br /> variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-281, 78-1288 (A), 78-1281 and <br /> Section 78-1432 to allow retention of an existin� nonconforming accessory stnlcture <br /> ("the boathouse") located within the 0-75' lakeshore setback where no accessory <br /> structure is norrnally allowed absent a principal structure on the site in conjunction with <br /> replacement of the existing residence on the property; and <br /> WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed legal notification, the <br /> Orono Planning Commission on April 19, 2004 held a public hearing on this request, at <br /> which time all parties interested in the project were allowed to comment. The Planning <br /> Commission subsequently on a vote of 7-0 recommended denial of the variances, finding <br /> that the boathouse was in a nonconforming location, constituted excess hardcover on the <br /> property, and should be removed at the time the property is redeveloped, and that no <br /> adequate hardship exists to support the granting of the necessary variances to allow the <br /> boathouse to remain; and <br /> WHEREAS, on April 26, 2004 the City Council voted 5-0 to support the <br /> recommendation of the Planning Commission and at the request of the applicant, refened <br /> the application back to the Planning Commission for review of an amended application <br /> Page 1 of 7 <br />